RE: attributes required but not both.

2003-02-25 Thread Karr, David
2003 2:02 PM > To: Tag Libraries Users List > Subject: RE: attributes required but not both. > > Cool thanks for the information. One point of clarification after looking > at > the sparse information I could find on the web is: > > Is it best practices to have both attributes ha

RE: attributes required but not both.

2003-02-25 Thread Dave Newton
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 17:02, Jeff Born wrote: > Is it best practices to have both attributes have a "false" required > attribute and then run isValid() to check if one or the other was supplied? I think you'd have to, otherwise you'd have to decide which one was pseudo-required, and that would pro

RE: attributes required but not both.

2003-02-25 Thread Jeff Born
anks, jb -Original Message- From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 2/25/2003 4:33 PM To: Tag Libraries Users List Cc: Subject: RE: attributes required but not both. Well, if you want to valida

RE: attributes required but not both.

2003-02-25 Thread Karr, David
ce of the TEI class in the TLD. > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Born [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:30 PM > To: Tag Libraries Users List > Subject: attributes required but not both. > > I have two attributes that one or the other is required, not bot

attributes required but not both.

2003-02-25 Thread Jeff Born
I have two attributes that one or the other is required, not both. Where do I define this? I know I read this is possible, but haven't been able to figure out where I saw that information. Thanks in advance for any insight into this, Jeff Born