On 12/20/10 7:01 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
> On 2010-12-20 22:16, Brian Warner wrote:
>> The other API would be used in a similar way, right after you build a
>> manifest, but it would mean "immediately cancel all my leases on
>> shares that weren't in the manifest". This would even be safe i
On 12/21/10 5:56 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> and avoid reinventing the trust management wheel
>
> Your comment made me realize more crisply that the real property I want
> From pgp is to be able to manage keys via pgp and then easily insert
> them into tahoe. I really do mean "manage via and inse
On 2010-12-21 3:35 AM, Ravi Pinjala wrote:
One thing I can't figure out: how do you handle losing your caps for a
share? In that case, it'd still count against your storage limits, but
you wouldn't be able to delete it. Having a backup method for deletion
wouldn't work, because then anybody could
On 2010-12-21 13:56, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> My real point was not that openpgp should be mandatory, but that
> whatever tahoe does should be compatible, and avoid reinventing the
> trust management wheel
>
> Your comment made me realize more crisply that the real property I want
> From pgp is to
My real point was not that openpgp should be mandatory, but that
whatever tahoe does should be compatible, and avoid reinventing the
trust management wheel
Your comment made me realize more crisply that the real property I want
From pgp is to be able to manage keys via pgp and then easily insert
