#1302: installing Python 3 breaks bin\tahoe on Windows
+---
Reporter: davidsarah | Owner: somebody
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: maj
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood
wrote:
>> 3. You have Twisted < 10.2 and Foolscap < 0.6.0 installed.
...
> The situation shouldn't occur because 'setup.py build', by default,
> should either:
>
> - have built a private copy of twisted < 10.2 (always used by bin/tahoe)
> that
Dear Josh, Shawn, Greg, et al.:
While it warms my heart to see people teaching each other, it's not
"scalable" for new users to be surprised when the behavior doesn't
match their assumptions, then post on the mailing list and get an
explanation about why the actual behavior differs from their
assu
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Pandelis Theodosiou wrote:
>
> This is great, but I can't currently have a server that is constanly
> connected to the net.
> So, count me in for volunteergrid3.
:-)
> One the other hand, (and since point 5 is missing :), why should the lack of
> a reliable rev
#1208: config should default to leaving 1G free
--+-
Reporter: gdt | Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: majo
#1300: turn on garbage collection by default, offer obvious deep-repair-lease,
warn about unset config
-+--
Reporter: zooko| Owner: nobody
Type: enhancement | Statu
#67: Use of uninitialised value in CryptoPP::Rijndael_Enc_AdvancedProcessBlocks
--+-
Reporter: Nikratio | Owner: Nikratio
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major |Version:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Brian Warner wrote:
> Servers should reject lease add/renewal requests when in readonly mode
>
I can see value in allowing for read-only storage servers that intend to
continue serving the shares they have, so I think lease renewals should be
accepted.
> When
On 1/11/11 7:19 AM, Shawn Willden wrote:
> Specifically, what I'm wondering what happens if a client running a
> deep-check --repair --add-lease tries to add a lease on an existing
> share and the storage server refuses the lease renewal?
That part of the code needs some work, on both sides. At p
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I've heard from a few different people that they want a Tahoe-LAFS
> grid to contribute a server to and receive storage service in return.
> There is one such grid in operation, called "volunteergrid", but it is
> not accepti
I'm in.
- Think carefully.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I've heard from a few different people that they want a Tahoe-LAFS
> grid to contribute a server to and receive storage service in return.
> There is one such grid in operation, called "volun
Specifically, what I'm wondering what happens if a client running a
deep-check --repair --add-lease tries to add a lease on an existing share
and the storage server refuses the lease renewal? Will the repairer assume
that the unrenewed share needs to be placed somewhere else? Or will the
client h
Folks:
I've heard from a few different people that they want a Tahoe-LAFS
grid to contribute a server to and receive storage service in return.
There is one such grid in operation, called "volunteergrid", but it is
not accepting new members at this time. Therefore, I'm creating a
mailing list name
13 matches
Mail list logo
