On 23/06/12 03:52, erp...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is the transition to git still happening?
Yes, after this release. (There will probably be a git branch equivalent
to this release as well.)
--
David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
On 23/06/12 03:40, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
> On 22/06/12 16:51, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
>> Also, it would be great to have some actual users try out 1.9.2 before
>> we finalize it.
>
> Definitely! Especially if you reported/experienced a bug against 1.9.1
> or earlier that has been fixed (s
On 22/06/12 19:21, Dirk Loss wrote:
> On 22.06.12 19:57, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn
>> wrote:
>>> Here you go. Please test!
>>>
>>> https://lafsgateway.zooko.com/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:hqjv4r2rve4mydw6zwub2wqnom:4go7k3hbwi7hkoaluxjm7yiode54hzdkcv
Is the transition to git still happening?
On Jun 22, 2012 8:40 PM, "David-Sarah Hopwood"
wrote:
> On 22/06/12 16:51, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> > Also, it would be great to have some actual users try out 1.9.2 before
> > we finalize it.
>
> Definitely! Especially if you reported/experienced a
On 22/06/12 17:26, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> Here you go. Please test!
>
> https://lafsgateway.zooko.com/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:hqjv4r2rve4mydw6zwub2wqnom:4go7k3hbwi7hkoaluxjm7yiode54hzdkcvw7a5k7hhfso5wcb7vq/
BTW, this doesn't differ functionally from the tarball I uploaded at
https://tahoe-lafs.org
On 22/06/12 16:51, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> Also, it would be great to have some actual users try out 1.9.2 before
> we finalize it.
Definitely! Especially if you reported/experienced a bug against 1.9.1
or earlier that has been fixed (see
https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/query?mileston
On 22.06.12 19:57, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
>> Here you go. Please test!
>>
>> https://lafsgateway.zooko.com/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:hqjv4r2rve4mydw6zwub2wqnom:4go7k3hbwi7hkoaluxjm7yiode54hzdkcvw7a5k7hhfso5wcb7vq/
>
> Ugh, I put the wrong
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> Here you go. Please test!
>
> https://lafsgateway.zooko.com/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:hqjv4r2rve4mydw6zwub2wqnom:4go7k3hbwi7hkoaluxjm7yiode54hzdkcvw7a5k7hhfso5wcb7vq/
Ugh, I put the wrong version number on there. It says "1.9.1a1", but I
meant
Good to know.
Will switch tomorrow!
Thanks, Zooko.
Iantcho
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> Here you go. Please test!
>
> https://lafsgateway.zooko.com/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:hqjv4r2rve4mydw6zwub2wqnom:4go7k3hbwi7hkoaluxjm7yiode54hzdkcvw7a5k7hhfso5wcb7vq/
>
> There are
Here you go. Please test!
https://lafsgateway.zooko.com/uri/URI:DIR2-RO:hqjv4r2rve4mydw6zwub2wqnom:4go7k3hbwi7hkoaluxjm7yiode54hzdkcvw7a5k7hhfso5wcb7vq/
There are many bugfixes in this version compared to v1.9.1. If you
have experienced *any* failures using earlier versions of Tahoe-LAFS,
then pl
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I thought tahoe was almost converted to git?
Yes, this will hopefully be the last release that we use darcs.
> Perhaps you could post a tarball that's just like the release,
I'm building a "1.9.2a1" tarball right now. We still intend to c
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
>
> We prefer not to fix bugs when we don't have a unit test that goes from red
> to green by that fix,
By the way, I really like this part of our process around here. We
don't (usually) kill bugs by shooting at them as they scurry aw
darcs is not easy if you're using a system for which binaries aren't
provided (and ghc isn't supported). I thought tahoe was almost
converted to git?
Perhaps you could post a tarball that's just like the release, and is
1.9.1.90 or something. That would enable me to update pkgsrc locally
(and
Dear Bertagaz:
We're almost ready to release Tahoe-LAFS v1.9.2, and I wonder if it is
okay to take a couple more days for extra testing or if we should
hurry and finalize it so you can package it for Debian?
We've fixed all but one of the issues that we intended to fix. You can
see the issue tick
14 matches
Mail list logo
