Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.8.0 progress report

2010-09-08 Thread Greg Troxel
Brian Warner writes: > On 9/7/10 6:29 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: >> >> I built 1.8.0c3 on netbsd-5/i386 (via an updated pkgsrc entry not yet >> committed) and it seems to work. 'tahoe check --raw' feels faster than >> the previous beta and 1.7.1. >> >> tahoe manifest seems to work reasonably quic

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.8.0 progress report

2010-09-08 Thread Brian Warner
On 9/7/10 6:29 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > I built 1.8.0c3 on netbsd-5/i386 (via an updated pkgsrc entry not yet > committed) and it seems to work. 'tahoe check --raw' feels faster than > the previous beta and 1.7.1. > > tahoe manifest seems to work reasonably quickly. Hrm, if your directories

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.8.0 progress report

2010-09-07 Thread Greg Troxel
I built 1.8.0c3 on netbsd-5/i386 (via an updated pkgsrc entry not yet committed) and it seems to work. 'tahoe check --raw' feels faster than the previous beta and 1.7.1. tahoe manifest seems to work reasonably quickly. "tahoe deep-check --verify --repair" gave me an 'uncoordinated write' error.

[tahoe-dev] 1.8.0 progress report

2010-09-07 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
Thanks to everyone who helped out this past weekend! We made some progress on the remaining issues: documentation issues, some edge cases in downloader which are probably exceedingly rare in practice, and the vexing "is this a critical performance regression?" issue (#1170). http://tahoe-lafs.org