Hi,
the time sync' notification is back, but is only displayed once
htpdate was started. This leaves the user for a few dozens of seconds
(possibly minutes) without any indication of what's going on.
Why don't we display the notification as soon as
/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/20-time.sh start
intrigeri wrote (21 Jan 2012 15:24:19 GMT) :
>> I say we implement this and try to push it into devel, test the hell
>> out of it, and if tests are good also push it into stable so it ends
>> up in the next point release.
> Agreed modulo s,devel,feature/tordate,. I'll implement it very soon.
Push
Hi,
anonym wrote (21 Jan 2012 14:47:53 GMT) :
> I agree with this reasoning.
After some more though, so do I.
Maxim: thanks for putting it clearly in words.
> I say we implement this and try to push it into devel, test the hell
> out of it, and if tests are good also push it into stable so it e
01/20/2012 07:15 PM, intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed some robustness improvements to feature/tordate (forked
> from stable branch, targetted at 0.10.1). I've tested it a dozen of
> times or so with various seriously wrong system clocks, and it works
> nicely for me; I could not reproduce the bugs
Hi again,
Maxim Kammerer wrote (20 Jan 2012 20:34:11 GMT) :
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:52, intrigeri wrote:
> Indeed, I removed the transparent proxying parts.
Thank you.
>> While you're at it, the features comparison in the
>> "Privacy-Enhancing Live Distribution" applies to Tails 0.8 and i
01/20/2012 08:53 PM, Maxim Kammerer:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 23:09, intrigeri wrote:
>> On October 9th, a commit of yours (58cc2dd) in Liberté Linux Git
>> repository made the very move we were unsure of. So I guess this
>> approach seemed safe enough to your eyes. May we know why?
>
> Well, as
01/21/2012 03:21 PM, intrigeri:
> Thoughts before we merge this branch into stable and devel?
No complaints from my side.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listi
anonym wrote (20 Jan 2012 18:07:10 GMT) :
> 01/20/2012 05:59 PM, intrigeri:
>> For every pool (trusted, distrusted, neutral) we need more hostnames.
>> Suggestions are most welcome.
Integrated those suggestions and some others that came to my ear; the
current lists are:
HTP_POOL_PAL="1984.is,d
