Re: [Tails-dev] [tor-talk] Please review Tails stream isolation plans

On 9/3/12, adrelanos wrote: > Nick Mathewson: >> Failing that, torsocks is indeed a way pretty good option. > I don't think so. It's only a hack. Doesn't work on Windows. APT doesn't work on Windows either. Robert Ransom ___ tails-dev mailing list t

Re: [Tails-dev] [tor-talk] Please review Tails stream isolation plans

Nick Mathewson: > On Sep 3, 2012 2:21 PM, "adrelanos" wrote: >> >> intrigeri: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Nick Mathewson wrote (30 Aug 2012 15:10:52 GMT) : or using some kind of iptables trickery? >>> >>> I'm not sure how doable it is to use iptables to convert HTTP proxying >>> to SOCKS, but I'd be happ

Re: [Tails-dev] [tor-talk] Please review Tails stream isolation plans

intrigeri: > Hi, > > Nick Mathewson wrote (30 Aug 2012 15:10:52 GMT) : >> or using some kind of iptables trickery? > > I'm not sure how doable it is to use iptables to convert HTTP proxying > to SOCKS, but I'd be happy to learn :) Iptables can not translate from one protocol to another. The clo

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review bugfix/fix_background_readahead

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:48:10PM +, Ague Mill wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 02:37:24PM +, Ague Mill wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:28:36PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > > Ague Mill wrote (01 Sep 2012 12:26:51 GMT) : > > > > Can someone else test the changes, now? :) > > > > > > :

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review bugfix/fix_background_readahead

On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 02:37:24PM +, Ague Mill wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:28:36PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > Ague Mill wrote (01 Sep 2012 12:26:51 GMT) : > > > Can someone else test the changes, now? :) > > > > :) > > > > I'm unlikely to do it any time soon on bare metal, > > but i

Re: [Tails-dev] Upcoming release schedule plan

berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org: > Hi, > > Following our discussions on the timeline for the next release, here is > the plan we ended up with and I committed to send on this list : > > - Theoritically: ESR (August 28th) + 1 week = September 4th > - August 23: release 0.13~rc1, do the test suite

Re: [Tails-dev] [tor-talk] Please review Tails stream isolation plans

Hi, Nick Mathewson wrote (30 Aug 2012 15:10:52 GMT) : >> * Pidgin > Not too scary, I think. You'd typically wind up with one destination > per chat, or one per chat protocol? Typically, per chat account. >> * Liferea RSS feed reader > This one is a little scary. Do I understand correctly

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails Server: Why not just an extensions to Tails Desktop?

Hi, Thank you for these comments! adrelanos wrote (03 Sep 2012 10:23:22 GMT) : > SSH-only administration makes it much more difficult. > - user needs to learn SSH I have to make it clear that the main configuration interface is a GUI, running in a "normal" Tails. So, no, the user does not need

[Tails-dev] Tails Server: Why not just an extensions to Tails Desktop?

https://tails.boum.org/todo/server_edition/#index5h2 "Remove unnecessary/irrelevant things from boot process Tails server should not spawn a full-featured desktop anymore: the goal of this iteration is to remove as much irrelevant services as possible (e.g GNOME, Xorg, ...) in order to reduce boot

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review bugfix/fix_slow_offline_documentation

Ague Mill wrote (01 Sep 2012 19:39:33 GMT) : > 7 iterations later, I found the culprit: '*box-shadow' properties. Great! :) > Therefore the fix in `bugfix/fix_slow_offline_documentation` is trivial: Tested, merged into devel and testing. ___ tails-dev

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails Server Edition

Hi, emgent wrote (01 Sep 2012 12:28:44 GMT) : > I'm thinking to start my contribute working on Tail Server > Edition(1). This is great! > Is someone already active and involved in this project AFAIK nobody is actively working on it since Julien Voisin gave up his GSoC project.