Ague Mill wrote (26 Sep 2012 13:48:11 GMT) :
>> October 9th: 0.14 freeze + release of RC1.
>> October 23th: ESR backport is (hopefully) available.
>> October 25th: release of RC2.
>> October 30th: release of 0.14.
> Fine with me.
Suits me well.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://ga
a...@boum.org wrote (26 Sep 2012 17:42:56 GMT) :
> I can't find a ticket for this issue. Please file one or point me to
> the ticket I have missed.
I'm happy you are playing the nitpicker role, but seriously, that one
is a regression caused by a branch of yours, so don't you think *you*
might want
Hi,
(thank you for following-up :)
a...@boum.org wrote (26 Sep 2012 17:43:09 GMT) :
>> > 2. When 0.13.x point-releases are out, write developers
>> > documentation and tools, prepare IUK, update update-description
>> > files, ask beta testers to try the incremental upgrade process.
>>
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (26 Sep 2012 18:28:06 GMT) :
> My fault, I did a simple merge and forgot the --no-ff option :/
> How can I solve this?
We won't rewrite history for such a tiny detail, so you cannot solve
what already happened.
However, you may solve it for future cases by writin
Hi,
Ague Mill wrote (26 Sep 2012 10:43:31 GMT) :
> These directories match Iceweasel localization packages. For 'es':
> [...]
Now I understand better -- given it was not clear to me right from the
beginning, perhaps this rationale should be part of the branch
history?
Anyway, I tested this branc
Hi,
Ague Mill wrote (26 Sep 2012 12:08:08 GMT) :
> htpdate lists a "--proxy" option. I may assume that when I don't
> specify this option, it will not use a proxy at all. But, the
> current code will still use a proxy if HTTPS_PROXY or ALL_PROXY are
> set. I think this is confusing.
Fair enough,
12/09/12 11:05, intrigeri wrote:
> hi,
>
> anonym wrote (06 Sep 2012 18:27:37 GMT) :
>> The crash occurs on my (64-bit) laptop. :/
>
> Do you mean, on your own system (if so: both kernel / userspace
> 64-bits? Debian Wheezy?) or within Tails feature/multikernel with the
> 686-pae kernel?
This wa
anonym wrote (27 Sep 2012 09:38:32 GMT) :
> This was in Tails built from feature/multikernel.
Thank you. I updated the ticket accordingly. So, next step is: somehow
fix our USB installer vs. the 686-pae kernel. I'm not committing to do
it any time soon.
> From: intrigeri
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:18:25 +0200
>
> a...@boum.org wrote (26 Sep 2012 17:42:56 GMT) :
> > I can't find a ticket for this issue. Please file one or point me to
> > the ticket I have missed.
>
> I'm happy you are playing the nitpicker role, but seriously, that one
> is a
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:26:51AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (26 Sep 2012 18:28:06 GMT) :
> > My fault, I did a simple merge and forgot the --no-ff option :/
> > How can I solve this?
>
> We won't rewrite history for such a tiny detail, so you cannot solve
> what
Hi,
I don't think we replied to this email. Should we? Volonteers?
Cheers
> From: adrelanos
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:17:02 +0200
>
> Hello,
>
> the current integration has a lot open issues and feature requests. [2]
>
> Because there might come a proposal [1] to solve this cleanly, I crea
Hi,
a...@boum.org wrote (27 Sep 2012 10:05:14 GMT) :
> I don't think we replied to this email. Should we? Volonteers?
I've had a look, and I don't think there is anything we have to add to
the wiki page created by adrelanos, which is basically a long list of
issues and usecases, including the one
Hi,
Debian FTP Masters wrote (27 Sep 2012 11:32:32 GMT) :
> Changes:
> live-boot (3.0~b4-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Switching to final name for the persistence configuration file
> 'persistence.conf' in line with boot parameter.
> [...]
Is this change really meant for the 3.x seri
24/08/12 09:21, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (22 Aug 2012 08:53:02 GMT) :
>> All is merged into experimental.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Unfortunately, I forgot to merge it at pre-freeze time, and
> unfortunately nobody noticed it in time since the todo/qa tag was not
> set after the last development rou
hi,
anonym wrote (27 Sep 2012 13:09:17 GMT) :
> Let's make sure this gets merged in time for the Tails 0.14 freeze
Sure! :)
> That will require an overhaul of the current documentation on how to
> use OpenPGP. I had a quick look and this is what has to be updated:
> doc/encryption_and_privacy/o
27/09/12 15:19, intrigeri wrote:
> hi,
>
> anonym wrote (27 Sep 2012 13:09:17 GMT) :
>> doc/encryption_and_privacy/openpgp_passphrase_encryption (symmetric)
>>
>
>> The context menu for gpgApplet is now different, so both screen
Jacob is about or is already working on it.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6948
intrigeri:
> adrelanos, did you read me, or should I forward this to you? :)
I did read *this* e-mail, no others. And I am subscribed to tails-dev,
although I can't read *all* tails-dev mails. Some st
Hi,
I think it would be good if tails_htp security would be further improved.
Anyone able to break SSL can tamper with the user's clock. This leads to
at least two known problems.
https://sourceforge.net/p/whonix/wiki/Security/#whonixs-secure-and-distributed-time-synchronization-mechanism
(To be
18 matches
Mail list logo
