Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread anonym
02/10/12 16:09, intrigeri wrote: Hi, anonym wrote (02 Oct 2012 13:14:58 GMT) : 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, push your pristine-tar branch. I followed the instructions in contribute/release_process/persistence-setup,

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:53 GMT) : Or can the rephrasing just live in git and be released as t-p-s 0.19 during the Tails 0.14 freeze when the translations has been done? I'm fine with that. Will you take care of make this happen? Also, any thoughts about how we'll handle the

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to me, although with nice side-effects. Making it into a proper feature (i.e. patching nm-applet) is definitely desirable, but not something I'm willing to take on for the 0.14

[Tails-dev] More stuff in Transifex

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, see https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6902#comment:1 The release process doc and translation doc likely needs updating. IIRC the latter has a ticket already. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/whisperback_1.6.1

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, * Use smtplib's timeout parameter I'll review and consider merging once you tell me you have tested that change (last time I've asked on IRC, you were not sure you had ;) Cheers! ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org

Re: [Tails-dev] Authenticated NTP is a long term goal?

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, adrelanos wrote (01 Oct 2012 17:23:11 GMT) : Authenticated NTP is a long term goal for us. I am wondering, is this still true? For the record, the complete sentence is Authenticated NTP is a long term goal for us, but not usable for the time being. I guess it is no long-time goal for us

Re: [Tails-dev] Faking htpdate user agent worth it?

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Jacob Appelbaum wrote (01 Oct 2012 01:09:48 GMT): [ about curl ] In some testing we did, we found that it leaked DNS basically everywhere unless you used some kind of HTTP proxy. :( I'm curious what version of curl exposes that, and: * Does curl's socks5h:// acts like socks5:// ?

Re: [Tails-dev] Faking htpdate user agent worth it?

2012-10-03 Thread David Fine
My first post! Speaking of the Appelbaum, check out this time daemon he wrote: https://github.com/ioerror/tlsdate It's not in debian repos, which is a strike against using it for tails. But leaking DNS is pretty bad. --D On 10/3/12 2:47 PM, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Jacob Appelbaum wrote (01 Oct