On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:03:42PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Branch: security/vidalia_in_its_own_user (no APT stuff)
No ticket.
Please review and merge into testing (and devel) in time for
0.21 final.
Tested, merged and pushed into devel and testing.
bert.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
intrigeri wrote (20 Oct 2013 11:45:54 GMT) :
Actually, please merge feature/linux-3.10.11 into testing only, and
please merge feature/linux-3.11-1 into devel (it his
feature/linux-3.10.11 in, plus the revert, plus the switch to
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (21 Oct 2013 12:36:23 GMT) :
Done, get a 1000x594 Torbrowser window compared to a 1000x573 one without
this patch. Closer to 200x100 aspect ratio, so I merged and pushed it in
testing and devel.
Thanks. I've asked upstream what they think about it:
Hi,
Mike Perry wrote (02 Apr 2013 08:52:56 GMT) :
#8511 might cause you problems if you use a $TOR_SOCKS_PORT env var with
a value other than 9151, though. You may want to either add iptables
redirect rule for 9151 or add an additional SocksPort line to your torrc
rather than messing with
Hi,
Mike Perry wrote (25 Sep 2013 02:37:38 GMT) :
I think you mostly want to pick up the patch for Bug #8478.
Thanks for the hint, done for Tails 0.21. Slightly weird results:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8478#comment:25
However, you should probably start investigating
Hi!
intrigeri:
unset TOR_CONTROL_PORT and TOR_CONTROL_HOST (non-working
anyway, since we are forbidding access to the control port for
the amnesia user)
What's your rationale behind that? Probably GETINFO address?
Would that be worth adding to Tails design doc? Haven't seen it
Hi,
adrelanos wrote (21 Oct 2013 15:33:11 GMT) :
since we are forbidding access to the control port for the
amnesia user)
What's your rationale behind that? Probably GETINFO address?
Exactly.
Would that be worth adding to Tails design doc? Haven't seen it there.
It's not in the
I added to Redmine more logo ideas, submitted by Andrew Pilkington from
Picasso Fish [1]. That a totally different look from what Carmie
proposed so far. I particularity like the bottom-right one, the mask
made with question marks.
See:
On 17/10/13 16:21, Alan wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:41:28 +0200
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote:
_(You are going to install Tails on the %(vendor)s %(model)s
device (%(size)s). All data on the selected drive will be lost.
Continue?)
I'm afraid that the phrasing make the suer believe
On 21/09/13 12:07, intrigeri wrote:
Alan tried to test this during the low-hanging fruits session, and
failed, so I:
* cleaned up the feature-consistent-peristence-path APT suite
(that apparently had an old version of devel merged in, which
certainly helps for early testing, but is a no-no
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (21 Oct 2013 20:14:08 GMT) :
I merged devel and testing into it. I think it has to be merged into
testing but I'd rather not do that myself.
Once we're frozen, we don't merge into testing branches based
on devel.
Oh well, yes we can, but then we have to go through
intrigeri:
You might be interested in the solution I came up with for Whonix. It's
called Control Port Filter Proxy. [1] In essence, wretch a proxy in
between Tor Browser and control port, allow a few hand selected, white
listed control port commands, discard the rest. I'd be interested in
12 matches
Mail list logo
