I installed Tails 0.22 using Tails Installer. But the USB stick does not
boot. It
I never used the Tails Installer of older Tails versions.
Booting is no problem from the same USB stick when Tails is installed on
it using the isohybrid+dd method of installation.
Cheers,
Andreas
Hi,
Matsa wrote (12 Dec 2013 00:43:38 GMT) :
the actual experimental ISO [1] freezes on startup (just after the
choice between normal boot and failsafe).
Thank you for this useful feedback.
Choosing failsafe reads This kernel requires an x86-64 CPU, but only
detected an i686 CPU. Unable to
Hi,
Le Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:11:44 -0800,
sam coleman dr.samuel.cole...@gmail.com a écrit :
Greetings,
I love the distro!!! You guys do a great job. I have a suggestion:
Ever thought of pushing out rolling releases which update the OS vs
pushing out completely new iso image?
An
Le Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:21:50 +0100,
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org a écrit :
Hi,
Matsa wrote (12 Dec 2013 00:43:38 GMT) :
the actual experimental ISO [1] freezes on startup (just after the
choice between normal boot and failsafe).
Thank you for this useful feedback.
Choosing
intrigeri:
now is the time to test this stuff live and detect remaining issues
before we enable it by default for all Tails users; here's how:
https://tails.boum.org/news/test_incremental_upgrades/
I promise there will be another incremental upgrade from 0.22~rc2 to
0.22, so if this
intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2013 10:21:50 GMT) :
Choosing failsafe reads This kernel requires an x86-64 CPU, but only
detected an i686 CPU. Unable to boot
... which means I've messed up the auto-detection bits in
feature/amd64-kernel. Sorry about that. Gonna work on this soon.
In the meantime,
intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2013 10:21:50 GMT) :
Thanks to winterfairy's tip [2] I was able to access the greeter, but
unfortunatelly the fact to login in the greeter doesn't seem to work:
with any options I activate, i'm falling back to the greeter.
It might be that I've messed something up when
Hi,
WinterFairy, please review my bugfix/6478 branch, that builds on top
of yours. Untested yet. I'll ask a formal go ahead for merging once I,
or someone else, has tested it for many languages.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
|
sajol...@pimienta.org:
Errata: Wednesday December 11, on #tails-dev (OFTC) 9pm UTC (10pm CET)
Here is a report of what we discussed tonight.
Volunteers to handle broken windows this month?
---
intrigeri and sajolida will work together with Kevin on
intrigeri:
after some initial reading, thinking and experiments regarding
UEFI support in Tails, I've come up with a first set of goals and
non-goals I believe to be reasonable to start with.
Quoting https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/UEFI/:
Goals
-
* devices produced by Tails
Hi,
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (12 Dec 2013 03:19:25 GMT) :
If I understand correctly this means that to bootstrap a Tails USB stick
you still need to go through BIOS somehow, either:
- A Tails DVD booting on BIOS (we assume this is most common for DVDs).
- A Tails USB stick manually
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 03:13:45PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
feature/torbutton-1.6.5.1 brings the latest Torbutton in. It fixes
a bug in the New Identity feature, that we lack, but I expect we'll
need an even newer version anyway for 0.22.1 or something, so let's
merge incrementally and
intrigeri:
Most ETA's I see displayed are seriously wrong, so I'm not convinced
it generally helps at all UX-wise. Is it really considered as a best
practice these days to display an ETA along with progress bars for
long operations?
When I am downloading large files (such as Tails binaries
Andreas Kuckartz wrote (12 Dec 2013 20:10:14 GMT) :
intrigeri:
Most ETA's I see displayed are seriously wrong, so I'm not convinced
it generally helps at all UX-wise. Is it really considered as a best
practice these days to display an ETA along with progress bars for
long operations?
When I
14 matches
Mail list logo
