Re: [Tails-dev] Adding BitMessage and Bitcoin-QT to Tails

2014-02-17 Thread intrigeri
s7r wrote (16 Feb 2014 12:37:02 GMT) : What about BitMessage? It doesn't seem to be part of Debian yet. Time to file a request for package bug, if there's none yet? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and possibly merge feature/wheezy-i2p

2014-02-17 Thread intrigeri
Kill Your TV wrote (16 Feb 2014 20:01:52 GMT) : I have pushed the result to the feature/wheezy-i2p branch in our main Git repo. Kill Your TV, may you please have a look I pushed a few changes so please pull again. (The ISO builds and everything looks fine as far as I can tell). Added a few

[Tails-dev] boum, distribute monetize your software

2014-02-17 Thread Victor Vlad
boum CodeFuel - Business inquiry Hi, I'm part of the Business Development team at CodeFuel, a division of Perion. I'm contacting you to discuss a possible partnership between CodeFuel and your company. CodeFuel offers a

Re: [Tails-dev] Release schedule for Tails 0.23

2014-02-17 Thread Alan
Hi, Hi list, I'll be release manager for the Tails 0.23 release. Here's the preliminary release schedule: Thanks for this schedule. I suppose bumping the release date by only one day instead (to 2014-03-19) is viable if I get enough assurances that others can help in the testing on

Re: [Tails-dev] 2014WinterDevMeeting/notes/TBBReleaseProcess

2014-02-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi, FWIW, from my Tails PoV: * I concur, it would be very helpful for us to have some better visibility on what's coming in the next TBB. * Mike has answered us in a very kind, timely and detailed way every time we've asked him this information. Many thanks! Also, I figured it would

Re: [Tails-dev] [tor-dev] 2014WinterDevMeeting/notes/TBBReleaseProcess

2014-02-17 Thread Al Jigong Billings
I will point out here that Mozilla generally freezes the tree by making a release branch a week before the Tuesday releases. Each candidate build (often only one) is normally built by Wednesday. Once Mozilla makes a release branch, there is no reason for TBB builds and testing to wait a few more

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/6390-dont-include-APT-lists-and-cache-in-the-ISO

2014-02-17 Thread anonym
09/02/14 11:48, intrigeri wrote: Hi, bugfix/6390-dont-include-APT-lists-and-cache-in-the-ISO fixes #6390 for me: the ISO I've built from experimental with this branch merged in is 900MB, while 0.22.1 was 931MB. APT works for me in the resulting ISO. As a nice side effect, the IUK's should

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/amd64-kernel (#5456)

2014-02-17 Thread anonym
21/12/13 18:02, intrigeri wrote: Hi, shipping a 64-bit kernel is a pre-requisite for UEFI support, as many (if not all) 64-bit EFI firmwares don't support booting a 32-bit kernel, and we won't be supporting any (rare, and mostly obsolete) 32-bit UEFI hardware. The feature/amd64-kernel

Re: [Tails-dev] Tor Launcher as a standalone XUL app in Tails [Was: Tor Launcher extension]

2014-02-17 Thread anonym
11/02/14 20:17, Mark Smith wrote: On 2/11/14, 11:23 AM, anonym wrote: 11/02/14 02:37, anonym wrote: # Tor Launcher in Tails All in all, not much is necessary to make Tor Launcher able to *only* control (as opposed to own, i.e. control + Tor is started by the controller, and Tor exits with