05/03/14 20:10, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> preamble: I'd like to see this in Tails 0.23, since this will be the
> first release when most users see incremental upgrades in action, and
> it would be good for them if the IUK download time was a bit shorter.
>
> I'm now running most of our automated
Hi,
> I did a *fresh* git clone of the tails git repository. What should
> I do instead? Is there a correct way to build tails?
You'll want to build from the devel branch, most likely, and ignore
master unless you're working on the website:
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/git/#index1h3
> I
I did a *fresh* git clone of the tails git repository. What should I do
instead? Is there a correct way to build tails? I did much the same as what I
did last week and tails built then. I followed the instructions on the tails
web site. Are there better (more correct?) instructions somewhere
Releases
Tails 0.22.1 was released on February 4.
Metrics
===
- Tails has been started more than 222 134 times in February.
This make 7 933 boots a day in average.
- 453 082 downloads of the OpenPGP signature of Tails ISO.
- 92 reports were received through WhisperBack.
Code
Hi,
You're apparently building from a tag that was already released.
Unfortunately, until we have the means to import the state of the
external APT repositories the build uses [1], this kind of builds will
very often been broken (either in obvious ways, as you've just
noticed, or in much subtler a
Hi,
preamble: I'd like to see this in Tails 0.23, since this will be the
first release when most users see incremental upgrades in action, and
it would be good for them if the IUK download time was a bit shorter.
I'm now running most of our automated test suite against this ISO,
in the hope it in
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (05 Mar 2014 10:30:02 GMT) :
> Regarding the Git workflow, topic branches should fix the FAQ according
> to whatever change they bring. I'm not saying they should fill up the
> FAQ in advance but they should make sure that the FAQ is still correct
> after the branch is r
intrigeri:
> I've pushed a few minor rephrasing and typo fixes (96d6899, 5a2ee0a).
I love them!
> Regarding "We are working on a 64-bit version of Tails see ticket
> #5456.", given feature/amd64-kernel was merged for 0.23, perhaps this
> should be rephrased.
I think the right way to handle those
