Re: [Tails-dev] License statement and font license

2014-04-02 Thread sajolida
Luigi Tesla Parisi: Well, i know that the deadline has been reached, but i send you again my logo, under Creative Commons, and with a changed font, named Arev Sans Bold which is in the fonts list you recommended. Hope you can accept it, Link to the works: http://imgur.com/a/8OwQv Hi Luigi,

Re: [Tails-dev] End of the submission phase for the logo contest

2014-04-02 Thread esperal esperal
Next thing we can create some funky wallpapers for Tails :) Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to

Re: [Tails-dev] Help needed/wished for 1.1 (Wheezy) tasks

2014-04-02 Thread anonym
20/03/14 11:24, intrigeri wrote: Code * NetworkManager does not auto-connect when MAC spoofing is enabled https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6911 @anonym: do you want to take care of it? For the record, this one has been fixed. * Unusable documentation window in the

Re: [Tails-dev] Upgrading the Linux kernel for 1.0?

2014-04-02 Thread anonym
20/03/14 12:07, intrigeri wrote: Hi, (stealing the RM hat for a short while, by initiating this discussion. anonym, I'll let you take care of bringing this to a conclusion.) if we don't do anything special, then we'll release Tails 1.0 with the same kernel (3.12) as 0.23. Given 1.0 will

Re: [Tails-dev] Help needed/wished for 1.1 (Wheezy) tasks

2014-04-02 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (02 Apr 2014 14:37:19 GMT) : * Adapt test suite for Wheezy https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6559 I've started already, and will try to complete this ASAP, to help evaluate how much stuff is still broken in a Wheezy build. @bertagaz, anonym: don't hesitate

Re: [Tails-dev] Upgrading the Linux kernel for 1.0?

2014-04-02 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (02 Apr 2014 14:50:51 GMT) : Looking at the Debian changelog for the Linux kernel it seems only these changes have CVE:s: Thanks! I've had a look (details below) and my conclusion is that... I'm unsure if it's worth taking the risk of introducing regressions in 1.0. Other

Re: [Tails-dev] Branches usage until 1.1 is out

2014-04-02 Thread anonym
20/03/14 12:00, intrigeri wrote: Hi, our experimental Git branch is generally used to merge stuff that is not quite ready for a proper pull request, but could use some testing. Best case, this stuff will make it into the next major Tails release. Our devel Git branch is generally used to

Re: [Tails-dev] Branches usage until 1.1 is out

2014-04-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (02 Apr 2014 15:47:33 GMT) : 20/03/14 12:00, intrigeri wrote: So, I propose we merge feature/wheezy into the devel and experimental branches, and use these branches (as usual) to prepare the next major release. Then, feature/wheezy can simply be ignored from now on. Do you