anonym wrote (26 May 2014 19:41:37 GMT) :
> 25/05/14 11:55, sajol...@pimienta.org wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for the draft. I improved it with commits 39e1aa4..81a6185.
>>
>> I think it's now ready for a final review and merge. I assigned the
>> ticket back to anonym as this should go pretty fast.
>
12/05/14 22:35, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anonym, you'll want to have an eye on that one.
For the record, Linux 3.14.4-1 has been in devel, experiemental etc.
builds for two weeks now, and I've run them on unusually many different
bare metal systems without any regressions. It looks good as far
26/05/14 19:53, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bugfix/7248-bg-color-vs-display-settings-change implements a simple
> workaround to #7248. Details of why I did it this way are in comment
> 3 on the ticket.
It's sad to see that Wheezy's GNOME fallback mode is in this shitty
state. Looks like we have so
27/05/14 01:45, anonym wrote:
> 26/05/14 01:06, Alan wrote:
>>> * Can we remove the "separators" (or whatever those lightblue, "dotty"
>>> things are calleD) on the left and right of the tasks?
>>>
>> Not as far as I know (of we should strongly tweak the GTK theme, which
>> I don't volunteer to d
26/05/14 01:06, Alan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This looks like a mix of Windows 8 and 8.1:
>>
>> * the color theme is like the default in 8
>> * the background image is the default from 8
>> * the start button is only present in 8.1
>>
> Some screencasts of 8.0 seemd to have it. Perhaps is it an option?
26/05/14 09:41, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I've filed #7173 about it, and am asking the Debian maintainer to
>> update syslinux in experimental. IMO, this is not be a blocker to
>> merge feature/uefi in time for 1.1, as VirtualBox 4.3 is available in
>> wheezy-backports, and I doubt anyone else t
25/05/14 20:37, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please review'n'merge bugfix/7234-zenity-dialog-height in time to
> "fix" #7234 for Tails 1.1.
>
> It's not meant to be a nice fix, but in parallel I've done the
> communication and relaying work needed so that upstream looks at the
> patch, so hopefully
26/05/14 14:57, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bugfix/7279-Florence-font workarounds #7279. Please merge for 1.1.
> Assigned to anonym.
>
> Reported to Debian as https://bugs.debian.org/749326.
I can confirm the bug and the fix. Merged!
Cheers!
___
Tails
25/05/14 11:55, sajol...@pimienta.org wrote:
>> I've draft something but I'm not familiar with our documentation and
>> would greatly appreciate a review. I reassigned the ticket to sajolida
>> but feel free to change that.
>
> Thanks a lot for the draft. I improved it with commits 39e1aa4..81a618
26/05/14 11:19, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (12 May 2014 14:45:05 GMT) :
>> I'll let you follow-up with the Tor ticket, and nag the TBB team
>> if needed.
>
> I'm curious (and would like our browser in 1.1~rc1 to be as close as
> possible to the one we'll ship in the final 1.1): an
Hi,
bugfix/7248-bg-color-vs-display-settings-change implements a simple
workaround to #7248. Details of why I did it this way are in comment
3 on the ticket.
Please review'n'merge for 1.1. Assigned to anonym.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/int
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (26 May 2014 15:32:17 GMT) :
> * Feeds that I had already fetched, and read some articles from, are
> empty after a reboot. When updating it again, the articles I had
> read already now appeared as unread. I consider this to be
> a clear blocker.
I realize that the newly
26/05/14 11:07, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> merged, thanks. Congrats!
Thanks!
> Other (non-blocking) comments:
>
> The entry in debian/changelog for 1.6.9.0 seems to lack everything
> that can be found in the 1.6.7.0 and 1.6.8.0 upstream changelog
> sections, that hence don't appear anywhere in
anonym wrote (26 May 2014 12:35:26 GMT) :
> 26/05/14 14:31, intrigeri wrote:
>> anonym wrote (26 May 2014 12:24:44 GMT) :
>>> Any way, I guess not removing python2.6 any more is a mistake?
>>
>> Nice catch! Yes, this does look like a mistake. I can safely remove it
>> from a runnig Tails/devel. I'
Hi,
anonym wrote (26 May 2014 14:12:02 GMT) :
> Ok, whichever way suites you best.
I've fixed the issues I had identified, reviewed Alan's work, fixed
a few other issues, pushed and tested everything, but built no .deb.
I'm now quite more happy with the current content of these branches.
However
26/05/14 11:40, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anonym wrote (18 May 2014 22:33:47 GMT) :
>> This branch imports Tor Launcher 0.2.5.4 (from 0.2.5.3) + a few fixes
>> from master (see commit message). With this package, our delta against
>> upstream has only decreased since upstream has fixed several th
26/05/14 15:23, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anonym wrote (26 May 2014 12:38:40 GMT) :
>> In other words, a s/usewithtor/torsocks/ is all that's needed, right?
>
> That would be my guess too, but I did not test it.
>
>> Given your two responses to this pull request, should I take it that you
>> re
Hi,
anonym wrote (26 May 2014 12:38:40 GMT) :
> In other words, a s/usewithtor/torsocks/ is all that's needed, right?
That would be my guess too, but I did not test it.
> Given your two responses to this pull request, should I take it that you
> reviewed this branch?
Until now, I had only read
26/05/14 15:14, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anonym wrote (20 May 2014 11:42:18 GMT) :
>> Luckily I found a proper fix, now ready for review in
>> bugfix/7065-keyboard-localization. It's in both Tails' and the Greeter's
>> Git, and a new Greeter snapshot has been uploaded to the feature
>> branch's
Hi,
anonym wrote (20 May 2014 11:42:18 GMT) :
> Luckily I found a proper fix, now ready for review in
> bugfix/7065-keyboard-localization. It's in both Tails' and the Greeter's
> Git, and a new Greeter snapshot has been uploaded to the feature
> branch's APT suite.
Congrats. I'm *so* happy not to
anonym wrote (14 May 2014 15:06:59 GMT) :
> Optimistcally assigning this to you, intrigeri, since it'll be related
> to fixing the rest of #7065.
Merged at the same time as #7065.
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/lis
Hi,
bugfix/7279-Florence-font workarounds #7279. Please merge for 1.1.
Assigned to anonym.
Reported to Debian as https://bugs.debian.org/749326.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.o
25/05/14 21:48, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan wrote (23 May 2014 09:59:22 GMT) :
>> * installing lifrerea 1.10 from wheezy-backports and starting it
>> through usewithtor
>
> Just my two cents on that one:
>
> Our codebase already uses torsocks and torify, and we also have some
> custom tsoc
26/05/14 14:31, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (26 May 2014 12:24:44 GMT) :
>> Any way, I guess not removing python2.6 any more is a mistake?
>
> Nice catch! Yes, this does look like a mistake. I can safely remove it
> from a runnig Tails/devel. I'll drop it directly in devel, if you
> don't mind
anonym wrote (26 May 2014 12:24:44 GMT) :
> Any way, I guess not removing python2.6 any more is a mistake?
Nice catch! Yes, this does look like a mistake. I can safely remove it
from a runnig Tails/devel. I'll drop it directly in devel, if you
don't mind.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ h
26/05/14 13:30, intrigeri wrote:
> Alan wrote (12 Apr 2014 10:47:24 GMT) :
>>> Created https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7013 for it,
>>> with hopefully all the needed information.
>>>
>> Anonym, please assign me a subtask of this if you want and notify me by
>> personal email.
>
> anonym, alan:
Alan wrote (12 Apr 2014 10:47:24 GMT) :
>> Created https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7013 for it,
>> with hopefully all the needed information.
>>
> Anonym, please assign me a subtask of this if you want and notify me by
> personal email.
anonym, alan: how's the review going?
Given our timing,
intrigeri wrote (25 May 2014 21:28:24 GMT) :
> sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (18 May 2014 17:44:45 GMT) :
>> Please review and merge into devel.
> I'll try to do that tomorrow. To start with, I've merged current devel
> in it, to ease reviewing.
Before reviewing, I've merged the current state of ma
Alan wrote (23 May 2014 09:59:22 GMT) :
> * implementing a liferea persistence preset
> - Branch:
> persistence-setup:feature/6403-implement-liferea-persistence-preset
> - Ticket: Implement Liferea persistence preset in Tails wheezy
> (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6403)
I suspec
Hi,
anonym wrote (18 May 2014 22:33:47 GMT) :
> This branch imports Tor Launcher 0.2.5.4 (from 0.2.5.3) + a few fixes
> from master (see commit message). With this package, our delta against
> upstream has only decreased since upstream has fixed several things we
> patched in our Tor Launcher. So
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (12 May 2014 14:45:05 GMT) :
> I'll let you follow-up with the Tor ticket, and nag the TBB team
> if needed.
I'm curious (and would like our browser in 1.1~rc1 to be as close as
possible to the one we'll ship in the final 1.1): any news on
this front?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi,
merged, thanks. Congrats!
Other (non-blocking) comments:
The entry in debian/changelog for 1.6.9.0 seems to lack everything
that can be found in the 1.6.7.0 and 1.6.8.0 upstream changelog
sections, that hence don't appear anywhere in d/changelog, since these
two versions were not packaged. P
anonym wrote (19 May 2014 17:25:51 GMT) :
>> Ah shit, I forgot that. Fixed in 98605bf that I merged myself into devel.
> You've pushed the feature branch with this commit, but not the merge
> into devel.
Done.
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (13 May 2014 09:47:45 GMT) :
> * It would be good to have #6562 at least partly resolved in 1.1.
> [...] I think that's the main blocker, but given it's "only"
> documentation, I think it's fine if I do it only post-RC, and
> can anyway be improved after 1.1 is ou
Hi,
> I've filed #7173 about it, and am asking the Debian maintainer to
> update syslinux in experimental. IMO, this is not be a blocker to
> merge feature/uefi in time for 1.1, as VirtualBox 4.3 is available in
> wheezy-backports, and I doubt anyone else than Debian users install
> the oldish ver
35 matches
Mail list logo
