Likely we want this into 1.0.1. Anyone up to add the LTS repo to APT
sources, with proper pinning? (I would suggest picking only selected
packages from there, since it's a free-for-all archive, so stuff may
not have seen the same amount of QA than regular Debian security or
stable updates.)
--- Be
From: epto
Hi,
my name is EPTO. I am the founder of Anopticon Project and tramaci.org
http://tramaci.org/anopticon (Map of Video surveillance cameras)
http://tramaci.org
I am participating in these projects:
Anopticon, Tramaci.org and the OnionMail Foundation, UVST, Winston
Smith, Mes3HackLab
> I do not know how Tails is supposed to persist software installed via
> debian packages...
That part is easy, if the apt stuff is persisted, it is as simple as
adding the package name to
/live/persistence/TailsData_unlocked/live-additional-software.conf
I do this for emacs because I'm like
> Looks good. Still, will need to persist the Tahoe-LAFS configuration.
> Hence my proposal.
Ahhh OK! I understand.
> Have you actually tried installing Tahoe-LAFS on Tails, in a way that
> it's re-installed automatically on every boot, and you don't have to
> reconfigure it every time you start
Hi,
David Stainton wrote (05 Jun 2014 16:58:52 GMT) :
> Since you didn't read the entire thread... I want to make it
> explicitly clear that there is most definitely not one "proper
> integration" design for Tails and Tahoe-LAFS... AND Tahoe-LAFS
> cannot help with persistence... wrong tool for th
Alan wrote (05 Jun 2014 14:30:26 GMT) :
> intrigeri wrote:
>> Alan, may we now consider that you've done a review (without tests) of
>> Andres branch, and it passes? If so, then I'll try to test and merge
>> this in time for 1.1.
> Yes
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaf
> (Disclaimer: I still have not read this full thread.)
OK...
>> is there any reason not to?
>
> If someone properly integrates Tahoe-LAFS withing Tails (including
> patching tails-persistence-setup, design doc, and whatever nobody has
> thought of yet), then I'm happy.
Since you didn't read the
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I still have not read this full thread.)
David Stainton wrote (05 Jun 2014 13:28:21 GMT) :
> I think what Zooko is suggesting is that the Tahoe-LAFS debian
> package be included in the Tails releases.
Thanks for clarifying.
> Now that we have debian packages and a maintainer
.
Oh, best thing, i didn’t have to set up refind!!
On 05-Jun-2014, at 20:17, Yashendra Shukla wrote:
> Hey devs!
>
>
> I downloaded the tails v1.1~beta1 iso from the website and verified it. After
> coming home, i formatted the usb drive (iball CORDIAL 8GB), using disk
> utility on my mac, into
Hey devs!
I downloaded the tails v1.1~beta1 iso from the website and verified it. After
coming home, i formatted the usb drive (iball CORDIAL 8GB), using disk utility
on my mac, into “fat32” and used the instructions given at-
https://tails.boum.org/doc/first_steps/installation/manual/mac/inde
Hi,
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:27:59 +0200
intrigeri wrote:
> Alan, may we now consider that you've done a review (without tests) of
> Andres branch, and it passes? If so, then I'll try to test and merge
> this in time for 1.1.
>
Yes
___
Tails-dev mailing
Alan wrote (05 Jun 2014 10:51:28 GMT) :
> - is it OK that I merge all buxfixes of gnome-theme-windows8 into
> master to build a package that I can upload in the camouflage topic
> branch and in experimental?
Why not merge all your bugfixes into another branch, called e.g.
"for-1.1", and build
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:20 AM, David Stainton
wrote:
> Like you... I am also curious what the Tails devs have to say about
> all this... however I suggest following the principle of least
> authority/privilege!
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege
>
> Why not just use p
Hi,
u wrote (05 Jun 2014 10:53:07 GMT) :
> I guess that this merge on their side will take some time to arrive in
> Gnome and in Debian anyway, yes.
Given wheezy-backports packages come from Jessie, as long as this
upstream change does not land into Debian testing before the Jessie
freeze, we're
Hi,
Alan, may we now consider that you've done a review (without tests) of
Andres branch, and it passes? If so, then I'll try to test and merge
this in time for 1.1.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaf
> Additionally, on any relevant Debian system, the command-line sftp
> client is shipped as part of the openssh-client package, that is
> installed in Tails.
>
>> Does it come with a Bittorrent client?
>
> No: https://tails.boum.org/support/faq/#index22h2
>
>> Can we make Tahoe-LAFS be the third th
Like you... I am also curious what the Tails devs have to say about
all this... however I suggest following the principle of least
authority/privilege!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege
Why not just use peer review + gpg signed git release tags? Are you
saying that a US h
Sorry to bug this list again about non-tails development, but I wish to
work with several developers on a fork of TrueCrypt this summer. We have
an interesting problem that you guys may know a lot about.
How can we develop secure code when any one of us might be secretly
attempting to insert a ba
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:47:18 +
Andres Gomez Ramirez wrote:
> > However, I fail to understand the need of these changes:
> > -builder.connect_signals(self.dialog)
> > +builder.connect_signals(self)
>
> I made this change because in the current way (self.dialog)
> you obtain
Hi Alan,
> Hi,
>
>> quoting:
>> "There has been a lengthy discussion this week on the gnome-flashback
>> mailing list, whether we will merge all gnome-applets into
>> gnome-panel. In the process of this merge, we would also add
>> window-picker-applet.
>>
> [...]
>> Do you have any ideas about t
Hi,
> (Ideally, the nightly builds from "experimental" should have the
> latest proposed stuff of this work, so that more people can easily
> test and provide feedback.)
I can merge every step of my work in experimental. But that raises a
few (hopefully easy) questions:
- is it OK that I merge a
Hi,
anonym, what's your plan regarding this? Are we bold enough to take it
into 1.0.1?
I say yes, given 1. the TBB folks are doing it for TBB
3.6.2; 2. not doing it would create a browser fingerprinting
regression for us.
--- Begin Message ---
#11253: Turn on TLS 1.1 and 1.2 in TorBrowser
--
Hi,
> quoting:
> "There has been a lengthy discussion this week on the gnome-flashback
> mailing list, whether we will merge all gnome-applets into
> gnome-panel. In the process of this merge, we would also add
> window-picker-applet.
>
[...]
> I have not yet read the whole thread.
Me neither,
u wrote (05 Jun 2014 08:18:58 GMT) :
> Done in
> [doc/gnome e010c17] adding missing http:// for link to GNOME in first
> steps documentation
> on my repo.
Merged, thanks. I've added another commit to point to a HTTPS URL.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/i
Hi,
u wrote (05 Jun 2014 08:12:09 GMT) :
> If you want to participate in correcting the documentation, you might
> want to read the corresponding doc on the website.
That is, https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/documentation/ :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanard
Hi,
after the recent episodes, the complications brought by Jessie's
Liferea in terms of security and persistence support, I'm more and
more convinced that we should bet on Icedove (Thunderbird) as our RSS
reader. One more reason to speed up the migration out of Claws
Mail, perhaps.
I've asked up
u:
> Hi,
>
>> I noticed a broken link in the documentation [1], tried to fix it,
>> process failed me. It's the very first url pointing to
>> https://tails.boum.org/doc/first_steps/introduction_to_gnome_and_the_tails_desktop/gnome.org
>> that should point to https://www.gnome.org/ hidden under the
Hi,
> I noticed a broken link in the documentation [1], tried to fix it,
> process failed me. It's the very first url pointing to
> https://tails.boum.org/doc/first_steps/introduction_to_gnome_and_the_tails_desktop/gnome.org
> that should point to https://www.gnome.org/ hidden under the word 'GNOM
28 matches
Mail list logo
