Hi,
I noticed a broken link in the documentation [1], tried to fix it,
process failed me. It's the very first url pointing to
https://tails.boum.org/doc/first_steps/introduction_to_gnome_and_the_tails_desktop/gnome.org
that should point to https://www.gnome.org/ hidden under the word 'GNOME'
Hi,
I noticed a broken link in the documentation [1], tried to fix it,
process failed me. It's the very first url pointing to
https://tails.boum.org/doc/first_steps/introduction_to_gnome_and_the_tails_desktop/gnome.org
that should point to https://www.gnome.org/ hidden under the word 'GNOME'
u:
Hi,
I noticed a broken link in the documentation [1], tried to fix it,
process failed me. It's the very first url pointing to
https://tails.boum.org/doc/first_steps/introduction_to_gnome_and_the_tails_desktop/gnome.org
that should point to https://www.gnome.org/ hidden under the word
Hi,
after the recent episodes, the complications brought by Jessie's
Liferea in terms of security and persistence support, I'm more and
more convinced that we should bet on Icedove (Thunderbird) as our RSS
reader. One more reason to speed up the migration out of Claws
Mail, perhaps.
I've asked
u wrote (05 Jun 2014 08:18:58 GMT) :
Done in
[doc/gnome e010c17] adding missing http:// for link to GNOME in first
steps documentation
on my repo.
Merged, thanks. I've added another commit to point to a HTTPS URL.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @
Hi,
quoting:
There has been a lengthy discussion this week on the gnome-flashback
mailing list, whether we will merge all gnome-applets into
gnome-panel. In the process of this merge, we would also add
window-picker-applet.
[...]
I have not yet read the whole thread.
Me neither, nut...
Hi,
anonym, what's your plan regarding this? Are we bold enough to take it
into 1.0.1?
I say yes, given 1. the TBB folks are doing it for TBB
3.6.2; 2. not doing it would create a browser fingerprinting
regression for us.
---BeginMessage---
#11253: Turn on TLS 1.1 and 1.2 in TorBrowser
Hi,
(Ideally, the nightly builds from experimental should have the
latest proposed stuff of this work, so that more people can easily
test and provide feedback.)
I can merge every step of my work in experimental. But that raises a
few (hopefully easy) questions:
- is it OK that I merge all
Hi Alan,
Hi,
quoting:
There has been a lengthy discussion this week on the gnome-flashback
mailing list, whether we will merge all gnome-applets into
gnome-panel. In the process of this merge, we would also add
window-picker-applet.
[...]
Do you have any ideas about this?
...even
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:47:18 +
Andres Gomez Ramirez andres.go...@cern.ch wrote:
However, I fail to understand the need of these changes:
-builder.connect_signals(self.dialog)
+builder.connect_signals(self)
I made this change because in the current way (self.dialog)
Sorry to bug this list again about non-tails development, but I wish to
work with several developers on a fork of TrueCrypt this summer. We have
an interesting problem that you guys may know a lot about.
How can we develop secure code when any one of us might be secretly
attempting to insert a
Like you... I am also curious what the Tails devs have to say about
all this... however I suggest following the principle of least
authority/privilege!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege
Why not just use peer review + gpg signed git release tags? Are you
saying that a US
Additionally, on any relevant Debian system, the command-line sftp
client is shipped as part of the openssh-client package, that is
installed in Tails.
Does it come with a Bittorrent client?
No: https://tails.boum.org/support/faq/#index22h2
Can we make Tahoe-LAFS be the third thing next
Hi,
Alan, may we now consider that you've done a review (without tests) of
Andres branch, and it passes? If so, then I'll try to test and merge
this in time for 1.1.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
Hi,
u wrote (05 Jun 2014 10:53:07 GMT) :
I guess that this merge on their side will take some time to arrive in
Gnome and in Debian anyway, yes.
Given wheezy-backports packages come from Jessie, as long as this
upstream change does not land into Debian testing before the Jessie
freeze, we're
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:20 AM, David Stainton dstainton...@gmail.com
wrote:
Like you... I am also curious what the Tails devs have to say about
all this... however I suggest following the principle of least
authority/privilege!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege
Alan wrote (05 Jun 2014 10:51:28 GMT) :
- is it OK that I merge all buxfixes of gnome-theme-windows8 into
master to build a package that I can upload in the camouflage topic
branch and in experimental?
Why not merge all your bugfixes into another branch, called e.g.
for-1.1, and build from
Hi,
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:27:59 +0200
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Alan, may we now consider that you've done a review (without tests) of
Andres branch, and it passes? If so, then I'll try to test and merge
this in time for 1.1.
Yes
___
Hey devs!
I downloaded the tails v1.1~beta1 iso from the website and verified it. After
coming home, i formatted the usb drive (iball CORDIAL 8GB), using disk utility
on my mac, into “fat32” and used the instructions given at-
Oh, best thing, i didn’t have to set up refind!!
On 05-Jun-2014, at 20:17, Yashendra Shukla yashendra2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey devs!
I downloaded the tails v1.1~beta1 iso from the website and verified it. After
coming home, i formatted the usb drive (iball CORDIAL 8GB), using disk
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I still have not read this full thread.)
David Stainton wrote (05 Jun 2014 13:28:21 GMT) :
I think what Zooko is suggesting is that the Tahoe-LAFS debian
package be included in the Tails releases.
Thanks for clarifying.
Now that we have debian packages and a maintainer
...
(Disclaimer: I still have not read this full thread.)
OK...
is there any reason not to?
If someone properly integrates Tahoe-LAFS withing Tails (including
patching tails-persistence-setup, design doc, and whatever nobody has
thought of yet), then I'm happy.
Since you didn't read the
Alan wrote (05 Jun 2014 14:30:26 GMT) :
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Alan, may we now consider that you've done a review (without tests) of
Andres branch, and it passes? If so, then I'll try to test and merge
this in time for 1.1.
Yes
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @
Hi,
David Stainton wrote (05 Jun 2014 16:58:52 GMT) :
Since you didn't read the entire thread... I want to make it
explicitly clear that there is most definitely not one proper
integration design for Tails and Tahoe-LAFS... AND Tahoe-LAFS
cannot help with persistence... wrong tool for the
Looks good. Still, will need to persist the Tahoe-LAFS configuration.
Hence my proposal.
Ahhh OK! I understand.
Have you actually tried installing Tahoe-LAFS on Tails, in a way that
it's re-installed automatically on every boot, and you don't have to
reconfigure it every time you start
I do not know how Tails is supposed to persist software installed via
debian packages...
That part is easy, if the apt stuff is persisted, it is as simple as
adding the package name to
/live/persistence/TailsData_unlocked/live-additional-software.conf
I do this for emacs because I'm like
From: epto e...@anopticon.org
Hi,
my name is EPTO. I am the founder of Anopticon Project and tramaci.org
http://tramaci.org/anopticon (Map of Video surveillance cameras)
http://tramaci.org
I am participating in these projects:
Anopticon, Tramaci.org and the OnionMail Foundation, UVST, Winston
Likely we want this into 1.0.1. Anyone up to add the LTS repo to APT
sources, with proper pinning? (I would suggest picking only selected
packages from there, since it's a free-for-all archive, so stuff may
not have seen the same amount of QA than regular Debian security or
stable updates.)
28 matches
Mail list logo
