Re: [Tails-dev] How the traffic confirmation attack on Tor affects Tails

2014-07-31 Thread sycamoreone
Hi, I like this and think it should be published soon. My 2cents of comments on some minor typos and suggestions/questions inline. (I you put it into Git somewhere I can also send a patch :) ) Jurre van Bergen: On Wednesday, July 30th, the Tor project released a security advisory[1] with

Re: [Tails-dev] How the traffic confirmation attack on Tor affects Tails

2014-07-31 Thread sycamoreone
sycamoreone: Tor has provided an updated version, we recommend you to upgrade to the s/Tor/the Tor Project The Tor Project with a capital T of course. 1: Set up an administrative password[3] 2: Connect to the internet 3: Run the following in a root terminal: apt-get update apt-get

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1.1] bugfix/7691-fix-ftbfs-with-apt-get-source-syslinux [Was: dpkg-dev / libdpkg-perl errors during build]

2014-07-31 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Kill Your TV wrote (30 Jul 2014 21:58:27 GMT) : Your suggested changes seem to have worked. (without apt-cacher-ng privoxy it passed. If I back out your suggested change, it fails) Thanks for confirming! Please review'n'merge bugfix/7691-fix-ftbfs-with-apt-get-source-syslinux into stable

Re: [Tails-dev] Replacing TrueCrypt with cryptsetup 1.6 + documentation?

2014-07-31 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri wrote (25 Jul 2014 09:42:05 GMT) : Other thoughts, feelings, opinions? Added to the monthly meeting agenda. I expect we'll turn this into a decision there, so if you can't attend (and even if you can, actually), you have 3 days left to comment on the current proposal. Cheers, --

[Tails-dev] Call for testing: isohybrid vs. Tails 1.1

2014-07-31 Thread intrigeri
Hi, it's been reported to us [1] that the isohybrid command, when run on the Tails 1.1 ISO image, displays a warning message. It seems that it could be even worse: it might prevent devices, onto which the hybrid'ed ISO image was copied, from booting on some systems. The root cause for this

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-testers] Call for testing: isohybrid vs. Tails 1.1

2014-07-31 Thread intrigeri
Hi again, intrigeri wrote (31 Jul 2014 15:22:13 GMT) : 8. If you're in the mood, retry step 7 with different combinations of isohybrid options (see its manpage). That's optional. It was suggested, on the syslinux mailing-list, that replacing --entry 4 --type 0x1c with -h 255 -s 63 should do

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1.1] bugfix/7691-fix-ftbfs-with-apt-get-source-syslinux [Was: dpkg-dev / libdpkg-perl errors during build]

2014-07-31 Thread Kill Your TV
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:25 + (UTC) intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote: Please review'n'merge bugfix/7691-fix-ftbfs-with-apt-get-source-syslinux into stable and devel. Candidate for 1.1.1. +1 on merging. -- GPG ID: 0x5BF72F42D0952C5A Fingerprint: BD12 65FD 4954 C40A EBCB F5D7 5BF7

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1.1] bugfix/7691-fix-ftbfs-with-apt-get-source-syslinux [Was: dpkg-dev / libdpkg-perl errors during build]

2014-07-31 Thread intrigeri
Kill Your TV wrote (31 Jul 2014 17:53:44 GMT) : +1 on merging. Thanks. It would be good if some of the other people who were reporting this bug on IRC did test the proposed fix, and confirmed it works for them... even if the patch does look right :) Cheers, -- intrigeri

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/6579-disable-tcp-timestamps [Was: Risks of enabled/disabled TCP timestamps?]

2014-07-31 Thread Patrick Schleizer
Hi, I haven't found the commit where you actually added /etc/sysctl.d/tcp_timestamps.conf. Does this implementation involve anything besides /etc/sysctl.d/tcp_timestamps.conf? http://www.tmltechnologies.com/html-2012/index.php/linux-rescue-kits/82-secret/91-disable-tcp-timestamps-on-linux

[Tails-dev] IPv6 (Was: firewall rules)

2014-07-31 Thread Kill Your TV
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:14:48 + (UTC) intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote: Hi, (happy to see someone look at these rules in details, and question part of it!) Jacob Appelbaum wrote (24 Jul 2014 01:28:54 GMT) : When would we ever have a RELATED or ESTABLISHED ipv6 connection when

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge 1.1.1] I2P boot parameter, firewall rules, etc. (Was: What to do about I2P in Tails?)

2014-07-31 Thread Kill Your TV
All, On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:02:18 + (UTC) intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote: On 7/26/14, sajol...@pimienta.org sajol...@pimienta.org wrote: Regarding the when, if we decide to do a first temporary step by having an i2p boot option instead of an option in the Greeter, then we don't