13/10/14 22:33, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (13 Oct 2014 15:53:54 GMT) :
>> * #8058 - Upgrade to Torbutton 1.7.0.1 final
>
> I think you forgot to push to our Torbutton Git repo, so I cannot
> review this part yet.
Sorry, done now.
Cheers!
___
Tai
anonym wrote (13 Oct 2014 15:53:54 GMT) :
> Please review and merge (Git and APT) into devel and testing.
Merged, congrats! Please in turn merge into the refactoring branch,
and resolve conflicts there.
However, there are still a bunch of serious unaddressed issues:
* #8060 -- The default Tor Br
13/10/14 22:17, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anonym wrote (13 Oct 2014 15:54:06 GMT) :
>> 11/10/14 12:40, intrigeri wrote:
>>> 1. install_debian_extensions() could take the list of packaged
>>>extensions as arguments (after the tbb_install one); sure,
>>>that's cosmetic.
>
>> Done in commit
Hi,
anonym wrote (14 Oct 2014 09:29:26 GMT) :
> I've applied all your suggestions.
Code changes look good, thanks! Not tested yet.
>>> (BTW: For conflict resolution with the stuff from
>>> feature/tor-browser-4.0, have a look at how it was done for experimental
>>> in commit 1e9e1442e4b3ad8e8249
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:58:38PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please merge bugfix/8082-remove-PulseAudio-warning into devel, for
> Tails 1.3.
Merged, congrats.
bert.
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/lis
14/10/14 00:57, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (13 Oct 2014 15:54:06 GMT) :
>> Please merge feature/8031-refactor-10-rbb-hook into devel and testing if
>> everything looks good!
>
> Also:
>
> --- a/wiki/src/contribute/release_process/tor-browser.mdwn
> +++ b/wiki/src/contribute/release_process/t
anonym wrote (14 Oct 2014 09:57:23 GMT) :
> Makes sense. I found it easier to automate the release process, see
> commit b36270b.
Great. Added two small fixes on top, pushing.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://m
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:52:03PM +0200, anonym wrote:
>
> Optimistically assigned to alant, the bug reporter. If you won't do the
> review'n'merge, please unassign yourself and let us know in this thread.
Merged into devel and testing as it is for 1.2. If that's not expected,
fell free to
intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now that the first step toward removing TrueCrypt entirely has been
> merged into devel (for 1.2), I've merged devel into the branch that
> implements the second step (that is, *really* removing TrueCrypt),
> and adjusted a bit the documentation.
>
> sajolida, may you p
13/10/14 22:18, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (13 Oct 2014 19:47:19 GMT) :
>> See the note in `wiki/src/contribute/release_process/tor-browser.mdwn`
>> of that branch. Basically, when using "https://";, apt-cacher-ng will
>> break, which e.g. Vagrant uses by default.
>
> I thought this was fixed
14/10/14 11:43, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anonym wrote (14 Oct 2014 09:29:26 GMT) :
>> I've applied all your suggestions.
>
> Code changes look good, thanks! Not tested yet.
I also pushed a fix for an error that slipped by.
(BTW: For conflict resolution with the stuff from
feature/to
14/10/14 11:28, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (13 Oct 2014 15:53:54 GMT) :
>> Please review and merge (Git and APT) into devel and testing.
>
> Merged, congrats! Please in turn merge into the refactoring branch,
> and resolve conflicts there.
>
> However, there are still a bunch of serious unad
anonym wrote (14 Oct 2014 11:54:38 GMT) :
>> I thought this was fixed by the version from wheezy-backports. If so,
>> why aren't we using it?
> Nope. I couldn't get the one in Wheezy to work at all.
I wrote wheezy-*backports*, so maybe there's a misunderstanding here?
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
_
14/10/14 14:45, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (14 Oct 2014 11:54:38 GMT) :
>>> I thought this was fixed by the version from wheezy-backports. If so,
>>> why aren't we using it?
>
>> Nope. I couldn't get the one in Wheezy to work at all.
>
> I wrote wheezy-*backports*, so maybe there's a misunde
Hi Guys
This is Hadi from Iran.
About last year, i sent a mail to Tails developer's list to include Orca
for blind and visually impaired, and almost very quickly it was
included, If i recall correctly.
I've tested tails 1.2 RC1, And there's a big problem with Orca in general.
The version of O
Hey,
We've made a lot of progress towards a new Greeter interface. We think
that the mockups of the current screens (welcome, and advanced
configuration) are ready for your review.
So, if the future of the Greeter is of interest to you please have a
look at this email and comment on it (ideally o
14/10/14 14:16, anonym wrote:
> 14/10/14 11:28, intrigeri wrote:
>> anonym wrote (13 Oct 2014 15:53:54 GMT) :
>>> Please review and merge (Git and APT) into devel and testing.
>>
>> Merged, congrats! Please in turn merge into the refactoring branch,
>> and resolve conflicts there.
>>
>> However, th
17 matches
Mail list logo
