Whoops, sorry for the typo in the branch name. I've already merged it
into experimental, so I guess I'll just leave it like that...
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, s
Hi,
This branch re-introduces the extra, localized browser search plugins we
earlier had when installing the Iceweasel l10n packages. Well, it only
installs them for the languages we install langpacks for, but once we
ship more langpacks this fix will install the Iceweasel search plugins
for them
Michael Carbone wrote:
> What are the obstacles towards all Tails USBs installed from a verified
> image (say v1.2) having the same fingerprint? Is this connected to the
> inability to directly create a Tails USB with persistence from an image?
Also note that it should be possible to check one by
sajol...@pimienta.org:
> intrigeri wrote:
>> sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (14 Oct 2014 18:08:54 GMT) :
>>> So, if the future of the Greeter is of interest to you please have a
>>> look at this email and comment on it (ideally on tails...@boum.org):
>>> [...]
>>> We're doing a last round of comments
On 11/06/2014 09:49 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Michael Rogers wrote (06 Nov 2014 12:41:53 GMT) :
>> If the USB stick is written manually using isohybrid and dd, is it
>> still the case that different devices would have different
>> fingerprints, or is it only an issue for USB sticks created with the
>>
Michael Rogers wrote (06 Nov 2014 12:41:53 GMT) :
> If the USB stick is written manually using isohybrid and dd, is it
> still the case that different devices would have different
> fingerprints, or is it only an issue for USB sticks created with the
> Tails installer?
I'm not sure if isohybrid (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/11/14 09:02, intrigeri wrote:
> Michael Carbone wrote (05 Nov 2014 19:26:33 GMT) :
>> What are the obstacles towards all Tails USBs installed from a
>> verified image (say v1.2) having the same fingerprint?
>
> The problems are described on
>
On 11/6/14, coderman wrote:
> ...
> i have asked tails-sysadm...@boum.org for the possibility of a reduced
> priv anon account for updating the tickets via the web interface
for the record, use the cypherpunks account. which meets the reqs...
___
Tails-
coderman a écrit :
>> If you really don't want to create yourself a Redmine account, please
>> at least indicate on each ticket you would normally have assigned to
>> yourself that you're working on this. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure we'll
>> see duplicated effort..
>
> i have asked tails-sysadm...
On 11/6/14, intrigeri wrote:
> ...
> #8220 is a subtask of #6880: to test the thing, we need an ISO first.
got it; thank you!
> ... Polipo users that are being migrated to torsocks ...
> ... should be tested with torsocks 2.x.
> ... [working branch can] be based on
> feature/5379-remove-polip
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (06 Nov 2014 08:41:52 GMT) :
> Merged, thanks!
:)
> I also removed the note about Indymedia now that OFTC has been working
> fine for some times.
I still see the note about OFTC/Indymedia on the live website and in
Git. Did you forget to push, maybe?
Cheers,
--
intr
hi,
coderman wrote (06 Nov 2014 09:55:54 GMT) :
> On 11/6/14, intrigeri wrote:
>> yay! shall I assign #8220 to you, then?
> anon could not log in, but these are the "mixmaster" / "torsocks"
> tickets on my radar:
> "please install mixmaster (or teach us how)" -
> https://labs.riseup.net/code/is
On 11/6/14, intrigeri wrote:
> coderman wrote (06 Nov 2014 08:57:20 GMT) :
>> i will do what i can to make branch feature/6880-torsocks-2 happen!
>
> yay! shall I assign #8220 to you, then?
anon could not log in, but these are the "mixmaster" / "torsocks"
tickets on my radar:
"please install mi
coderman wrote (06 Nov 2014 08:57:20 GMT) :
> i will do what i can to make branch feature/6880-torsocks-2 happen!
yay! shall I assign #8220 to you, then?
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubs
Hi,
Michael Carbone wrote (05 Nov 2014 19:26:33 GMT) :
> What are the obstacles towards all Tails USBs installed from a verified
> image (say v1.2) having the same fingerprint?
The problems are described on https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7496.
FS UUIDs, partition table differencies due to di
On 11/6/14, intrigeri wrote:
> ...
> Sure. And indeed, as indicated in the initial email on this thread,
> the removal of polipo seems to be blocked by our migration to torsocks
> 2.x.
indeed,
i will do what i can to make branch feature/6880-torsocks-2 happen!
this dovetails into an IRC discuss
coderman wrote (06 Nov 2014 08:34:54 GMT) :
> torsocks 2.0 is much better than old torsocks, and better than polipo
> in most cases.
Sure. And indeed, as indicated in the initial email on this thread,
the removal of polipo seems to be blocked by our migration to torsocks
2.x.
_
intrigeri wrote:
> sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (14 Sep 2014 17:54:03 GMT) :
>> sajol...@pimienta.org wrote:
>>> Regarding low-hanging fruit session, I think that what we are missing is
>>> a page in "Contribute: Collective process" describing the whole thing.
>
>> This has a ticket now: https://la
On 11/6/14, intrigeri wrote:
> ...
> We won't ship anything that requires a HTTP proxy, so if they install
> additional stuff, then they're on unsupported land and the ball is on
> their court. In most cases, torsocks will be enough.
torsocks 2.0 is much better than old torsocks, and better than
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (05 Nov 2014 15:32:59 GMT) :
> I'm a fan of removing Polipo - I wonder - what will Tails users use
> for an HTTP proxy?
We won't ship anything that requires a HTTP proxy, so if they install
additional stuff, then they're on unsupported land and the ball is on
their court. In
20 matches
Mail list logo
