Re: [Tails-dev] Getting rid of Vidalia [Was: What to do about I2P in Tails?]

Hi, On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 17:33:33 +0200 intrigeri wrote: > Jacob Appelbaum wrote (27 Jul 2014 14:24:53 GMT) : > > Vidalia is unmaintained but it isn't currently a security problem. > > Long term, we need a different solution for sustainability, of course. > > Yes. Once Tor#8641 is implemented [1]

[Tails-dev] Kudos_on_1.2.3

Really. Everything from download to use with 'persistence' went smoothly and works excellently -- reliably and fast --, thanks to your development team, and clear and concise explanations. Thank you very much, and best wishes to you and yours. ___ Tails

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking "upstream" AppArmor profile

intrigeri wrote (04 Feb 2015 10:36:45 GMT) : > Good enough? Shall we try that and see? I've implemented #3 already, > and can do #1 and #2 for Tails 1.3.1. Thanks for the replies. Created #8852 to track the next steps. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-de

Re: [Tails-dev] Hybrid ISOs: need to reconsider the plan (#8510)

Hi, On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:38:07 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > Alan wrote (18 Jan 2015 13:40:37 GMT) : > > I'll do that within the week to all computers I have access to. > > Any regression detected? > No, but all the computers with a working DVD reader were fairly new. Cheers _

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] feature/8719-mount-output-in-bug-reports

Hi, On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:17:23 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > this branch includes the output of mount(8) in WhisperBack bug > reports, for various reasons mentioned on the ticket. > > Please review'n'merge into devel for 1.3, thanks. > Merged, thanks! _

Re: [Tails-dev] Greeter mockups

Hi, On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:19:22 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > FYI I'm told the blueprint is now out-of-date comparing to the current > state of discussion and mockups. > Thanks for pointing this out. > See e.g. > https://labs.riseup.net/code/attachments/download/651/greeter1.png > > => likely thos

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] bugfix/7450-too_easy_to_exit (on openpgp applet repository)

Hi, On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:19:43 +0100 Clement Hermann wrote: > I fixed #7450 in my Tails OpenPGP Applet repository, in the > bugfix/7450-too_easy_to_exit branch. It should apply cleanly on the > version currently in Tails : > https://git-tails.immerda.ch/nodens/openpgp-applet/commit/?h=bugfix/74

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking "upstream" AppArmor profile

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:10:31PM +0100, anonym wrote: > On 04/02/15 11:36, intrigeri wrote: > [...] > > Good enough? Shall we try that and see? I've implemented #3 already, > > and can do #1 and #2 for Tails 1.3.1. > > I'm convinced and have nothing more to add than "well done!". :) I do too. T

[Tails-dev] Deadline [was: Re: Automated builds specification]

Hi, Given we had inputs from most of the usual suspects in this discussion (sometimes in side channels), and the proposals have been made since a little while, I'd say we can put a deadline on: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:59:59 + So unless no one raises concerns by then, #8657 can be worked on. ber

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] feature/7999-Vietnamese-input

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:07:31AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > > this branch adds support for Vietnamese input via the IBus > Unikey engine. Please review'n'merge into devel for 1.3. I'm not much comfortable with the workaround of Debian bug #714932, I think the patch lying in this bug report would

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking "upstream" AppArmor profile

On 04/02/15 11:36, intrigeri wrote: [...] > Good enough? Shall we try that and see? I've implemented #3 already, > and can do #1 and #2 for Tails 1.3.1. I'm convinced and have nothing more to add than "well done!". :) Cheers! ___ Tails-dev mailing list

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking "upstream" AppArmor profile

Hi, anonym wrote (26 Jan 2015 12:17:22 GMT) : > While I appreciate #1 forcing us to track upstream, I think these build > failures that depend on things external to Tails (e.g. fetching from APT > repos outside of our control) are quite problematic: > * They further complicate things for potentia

[Tails-dev] Jenkins build is back to normal : build_Tails_ISO_feature-jessie #317

See ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.