intrigeri wrote (28 Jan 2015 16:32:57 GMT) :
sajolida wrote (27 Jan 2015 20:31:03 GMT) :
We could also use the underlay plugin of ikiwiki to combine both Git
repos to have them compiled as part a single website by ikiwiki.
Great idea! I assume it'll be a bit more work for r...@boum.org to set
On 21/02/15 17:24, intrigeri wrote:
Also, if you're Alan, anonym, bertagaz or sajolida, look for your name
on that blueprint: there are a few branches I need your opinion about
= please move them to the appropriate section.
I've deal with my section now. I had completely forgotten about the
On 19/02/15 22:38, anonym wrote:
Hi,
See the ticket for details, in particular from comment #16 and on.
Please review and merge into devel and testing.
I withdraw this merge request. See the ticket for details.
Cheers!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Jurre van Bergen:
Hi folks,
I want to make you all aware that we will be rewriting the git history
of tails.git, our main git repository. To make it easy for everybody and
have less pain for us or for yourself in the future. I would like to ask
you to push any local branches you might have
Hi,
Please review'n'merge into testing and devel.
Cheers!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to
tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Hi,
Jurre van Bergen wrote (21 Feb 2015 14:01:54 GMT) :
I have worked on a blueprint (delete obsolete Git branches)[1] and would
like to ask you to review it. Does the proposed workflow makes sense?
Did I miss anything? Would you like to see anything changed and if so, why?
Looks good. Pushed
On 02/22/2015 05:47 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Looks good. Pushed a few minor rephrasing and formatting improvements.
Cheers!
There's one confusing point, though: somewhere it is said that merged
branches can be deleted After a new Tails release has been shipped,
while elsewhere I see it can be
A minor typo fix (s/any way/anyway/)
http://repo.or.cz/tails/kytv.gitfeature/6739-electrum-typo-fix
pgpu5YtfmKGJB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
Alan wrote (22 Feb 2015 02:10:26 GMT) :
* feature/edit-additional-software-conffile: this branch adds a
subcommand to tails-additionnal software to ease creation/edition of
its configuration. I don't remember why it never got merged.
The question is: should we keep it?
*
BitingBird wrote (22 Feb 2015 23:11:58 GMT) :
Please apply the patch, so I can correct the link in the 2014 report :)
Merged, thanks!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this
intrigeri:
Questions?
What if we need to publish an important workaround for a bug in 1.3?
Would you (the people locking the repo) be still able to do some
emergency commits to it?
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
sajolida wrote (22 Feb 2015 20:12:23 GMT) :
What if we need to publish an important workaround for a bug in 1.3?
On the website? As an emergency point-release? Anything else?
Anyway, good question, and probably it doesn't change much my answer
below:
Would you (the people locking the repo) be
Hi, intrigeri. Sorry it's taken a while to respond, you gave me a lot
to think about. The potential lack of VT-x/d implies that any
virtualization solution should be based around tor browser or whatever
you're currently using, which I am fine with. I think it will be
feasible to run the tor
Please apply the patch, so I can correct the link in the 2014 report :)
BitingBird
From f3a1f65fc43c53086e79ba198c24572a83a062d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tails developers amne...@boum.org
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:07:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] correct anchors in secure deletion
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
