Re: [Tails-dev] another patch to the known issue list

Hi ! > I see no patch attached. that's because I forgot to attach it. sorry, I'm tired, there it is. cheers. From 57e74e9eebb820c029eb2e12d7b8c7b525abfb64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Debian Live user Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:11:09 + Subject: [PATCH 1/2] harmonization of "does not sta

[Tails-dev] Fw: schneier.com comments

Hi! a user send us that... cheers. Begin forwarded message: FYI from last 100 comments @ Schneier.com: March 29, 2015 2:34 AM TAILS Linux WARNING v.1.3.1 (re: tails-autotest-remote-shell) on Friday Squid Blogging: Using Squid Proteins for Commercial Camouflage Products: In TAILS 1.3.1,

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_feature-jessie #419

See -- [...truncated 8271 lines...] Get:1165 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main libreoffice-core i386 1:4.3.3-2 [29.8 MB] Get:1166 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie/mai

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #321

See Changes: [anonym] Add manual test. -- [...truncated 7035 lines...] Get:1094 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main libmoosex-lazyrequire-perl all 0.07-1 [7764 B] Get:1095 ht

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_experimental #2157

See -- [...truncated 7055 lines...] Get:1095 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main libmoosex-lazyrequire-perl all 0.07-1 [7764 B] Get:1096 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #320

See Changes: [anonym] Remove test that has been automated. -- [...truncated 7035 lines...] Get:1094 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main libmoosex-lazyrequire-perl all 0.07-1

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #319

See Changes: [anonym] Fix package name. [anonym] Update upgrade-description files. -- [...truncated 7035 lines...] Get:1094 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main libmoosex-laz

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #318

See Changes: [anonym] Updating SquashFS sort file -- [...truncated 7035 lines...] Get:1094 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main libmoosex-lazyrequire-perl all 0.07-1 [7764 B]

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

Hi, bertagaz wrote (29 Mar 2015 13:04:11 GMT) : > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:44:32PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: >> => bertagaz and Jurre, may you please capture this problem, and the >> long-term solution ideas we had, in the "Future ideas" section of >> the blueprint? > Done in scenarios 14 and 15,

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

Hi, anonym wrote (25 Mar 2015 16:30:26 GMT) : > On 25/03/15 16:44, intrigeri wrote: >> anonym wrote (24 Mar 2015 16:50:06 GMT) : >>> However, I think the reason I asked for this feature was to trigger >>> rebuilds when the feature branch's APT suite has been updated. From >>> reading the blueprint

Re: [Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #317

anonym wrote (30 Mar 2015 17:39:40 GMT) : > I had to re-build and re-upload these two packages (to stable). Perhaps > the autobuilder built stable just when the old packages were there, and > now has the old packages in its APT cacher? Quite possibly, yes.

Re: [Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #317

On 30/03/15 19:23, tails-sysadm...@boum.org wrote: > Failed to fetch > http://deb.tails.boum.org/pool/main/t/tails-iuk/tails-iuk_1.20-1_all.deb > Size mismatch > Failed to fetch > http://deb.tails.boum.org/pool/main/t/tails-persistence-setup/tails-persistence-setup_1.0.21-1_all.deb > Size mis

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #317

See Changes: [amnesia] updated PO files [intrigeri] Remove past release. [intrigeri] Clarify how to add the release to TWN. [amnesia] Add #8942 [intrigeri] Debian Jessie may not have Docker at all in the end. [intrigeri]

Re: [Tails-dev] another patch to the known issue list

goupille wrote (30 Mar 2015 16:20:14 GMT) : > not the same patch as before : it is an harmonization of the "... does not > start > Tails" lines and the adding of a macbook pro to the list of hardware that > doesn't > support the shutdown process. I see no patch attached.

[Tails-dev] another patch to the known issue list

Hi ! not the same patch as before : it is an harmonization of the "... does not start Tails" lines and the adding of a macbook pro to the list of hardware that doesn't support the shutdown process. cheers. signature.asc Description: PGP signature _

Re: [Tails-dev] patch to the known_issues list

goupille wrote (30 Mar 2015 15:38:31 GMT) : >> * just to be clear: did these machines boot from Tails 1.3 "made with >>Tails Installer"? > no, they don't. Oops, sorry, I really meant: * just to be clear: did these machines boot from Tails 1.2.3 "made with Tails Installer"? (because I'd

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_stable #316

See Changes: [intrigeri] Revert "Simplify the instructions for updating Tor Browser." -- [...truncated 7065 lines...] Get:1094 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main libmoosex-l

Re: [Tails-dev] patch to the known_issues list

Hi ! > * just to be clear: did these machines boot from Tails 1.3 "made with >Tails Installer"? no, they don't. > > * what's the exact behaviour the user sees when Tails 1.3.1 fails >to boot? > > (I can't remember of any change, between 1.3 and 1.3.1, that would > impact booting fro

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge: 1.3.2] feature/tor-browser-4.0.6

On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:31:02 + (UTC) bertagaz wrote: > Everything works fine, except that I can't connect to eepsites when > testing i2p. It does seem to be the case with 1.3.1 too though, so > that's not really a regression. I've not had any problems in neither this branch, stable, nor 1.3.

Re: [Tails-dev] underlay for UX or blueprints

Hi, sajolida wrote (27 Mar 2015 14:16:15 GMT) : > I'm sending a copy to tails-ux to let them know that this discussion is > going on but I think that it belongs to tails-dev. Dropping -ux@ from Cc, then. > Our needs are: > - Sharing many files that are not plain text. We work a lot with >

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

On 29/03/15 15:04, bertagaz wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, lagging a bit one my emails. > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:44:32PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: >> Hi, >> >> anonym wrote (24 Mar 2015 16:50:06 GMT) : >>> However, I think the reason I asked for this feature was to trigger >>> rebuilds when the feat