[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:website advisory]

Small typo on the security notes, spotted by user, confirmed by me. At https://tails.boum.org/security/Numerous_security_holes_in_1.3.2/index.en.html the link to the tor advisory (the last) should be https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3216 instead of https://www.debian.org/security/2015/d

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

On 12/05/2015 18:54, sajolida wrote: > > B. It's not the latest version of the extension. This version is > incompatible with the version of the page. We can't go forward or > otherwise stuff won't work: > > - How can we detect that? Through a version number in the URL as you > are proposing? Wou

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt

Hi, [please don't Cc me, I read the list.] Marco Polo wrote (13 May 2015 04:42:35 GMT) : > I see you are looking at tcplay to replace TrueCrypt because it supports TC > with > additional functionality. Where did you find this information? It looks pretty much out-of-date to me. > How do I add

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt

Marco Polo: > I see you are looking at tcplay to replace TrueCrypt because it supports > TC with additional functionality. I think it's a good idea. > > How do I add VeraCrypt to the list of candidates? > > VC is a direct upgrade of TC, completely backward compatible with > existing TC volumes/co

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:website advisory]

emmapeel wrote (13 May 2015 07:58:18 GMT) : > the link to the tor advisory (the last) should be > https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3216 instead of > https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3246 > patch attached! merged, thanks! ___ Tails-dev m

Re: [Tails-dev] overlay support in bilibop

Hi, quidame wrote (09 May 2015 22:57:33 GMT) : > On 07/05/2015 13:44, intrigeri wrote: >> >> May you please also provide a patch that applies on top of bilibop >> 0.4.23? I need to build a Tails/Jessie ISO with a newer kernel (that >> only supports overlayfs). > 'git diff debian/0.4.23..451b58ad

Re: [Tails-dev] overlay support in bilibop

Hi, quidame wrote (09 May 2015 22:57:33 GMT) : > On 07/05/2015 13:44, intrigeri wrote: >> >> May you please also provide a patch that applies on top of bilibop >> 0.4.23? I need to build a Tails/Jessie ISO with a newer kernel (that >> only supports overlayfs). > 'git diff debian/0.4.23..451b58ad

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt

intrigeri: > [please don't Cc me, I read the list.] > > Marco Polo wrote (13 May 2015 04:42:35 GMT) : >> I see you are looking at tcplay to replace TrueCrypt because it supports TC >> with >> additional functionality. > > Where did you find this information? It looks pretty much out-of-date > to

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt

sajolida wrote (13 May 2015 10:34:39 GMT) : > intrigeri: > https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/replace_truecrypt/ > Says "Due to various concerns, TrueCrypt is about to be replaced in > Tails, either by tcplay or cryptsetup." > Shall we delete that blueprint now that #5373 is solved? Thanks! I've a

[Tails-dev] Jenkins build is back to normal : build_Tails_ISO_stable #391

See ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.

[Tails-dev] Test to see why my emails are held in moderation

Look at the subject :) -- Giorgio Maone https://maone.net ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.

[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_experimental #2265

See -- [...truncated 3805 lines...] 102 translated messages, 4 fuzzy translations, 5 untranslated messages. .. done. 110 translated messages, 1 untranslated message.