[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9560-tor-0.2.6.9

2015-06-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, I'm very sorry to come up with this request this late in the cycle, but we should really upgrade Tor to its latest version. I had started doing it a couple weeks ago but my package lacked a patch (because the release doc hadn't been updated after we decided to include said patch, gah). I resum

[Tails-dev] Please postpone your 1.4.1 tickets you won't complete in time

2015-06-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, we're now in the last 3 days of the release cycle, and we currently have 37 "confirmed" tickets and 48 "in progress" ones marked for this release. I suspect that 95% of them have no chance to be completed during this cycle by now => please postpone them at will, to ease the RM work (currently,

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9649-tor-browser-4.5.3

2015-06-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, this branch updates Tor Browser to 4.5.3 (-build2, hopefully the final one). It passes a great part of our test suite, details on the ticket. Alan, bertagaz: any taker? Note that I'll have to merge this one too before building the 1.4.1 ISO anyway. Cheers, -- intrigeri

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9560-tor-0.2.6.9

2015-06-28 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 03:53:50PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very sorry to come up with this request this late in the cycle, > but we should really upgrade Tor to its latest version. I had started > doing it a couple weeks ago but my package lacked a patch (because the > release doc ha

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9560-tor-0.2.6.9

2015-06-28 Thread intrigeri
bertagaz wrote (28 Jun 2015 16:02:58 GMT) : > I can do some reviews tomorrow morning, hopefully both, but happy to see > if Alan manage to do some too. :) Excellent. Then, please assign one of those tickets to you. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev ma

Re: [Tails-dev] Release versioning

2015-06-28 Thread intrigeri
hi, sajolida wrote (22 Jun 2015 16:16:07 GMT) : > Ok, so what's the next step here? > - Shall someone sum up all this is in /contribute/release_schedule? Yes. I've gone through this thread and a quick copy'n'paste summary is: * always increment the first number with major Debian version * als