On 31/08/2015 20:55, sajolida wrote:
> Giorgio Maone:
>
>> The main roadblock was Mozilla finalizing its add-ons migration strategy
>> to the Electrolysis (e10s) multi-process & sandboxing architecture.
>> Without an ultimate public decision, which has been deemed "imminent"
>> for all the past mon
Hi,
I added two laptops that don't shutdown properly Tails, and need a
brutal shutdown to the known issues page. This change is to review from
here:
mercedes508 dellE6230 90a758a & e0efb6e
But I was wondering how relevant it is to add computers there, as that
list might never ends, wrt. to UEFI
On 09/02/2015 11:11 AM, anonym wrote:
> Failing Scenarios:
> cucumber features/time_syncing_bridges.feature:29 # Scenario: Clock way
> in the past in bridge mode
> cucumber features/time_syncing_bridges.feature:45 # Scenario: Clock way
> in the future in bridge mode
> cucumber features/tor_stream_i
sajolida:
> Hi,
Hey,
> Meta: putting tails-ux in copy for the info but please answer on
> tails-dev only.
>
> I wanted to clarify a bit what's going on regarding the development of
> the Verification Extension (#7552).
>
> In terms of specs, I realized that we were not taking into account the
>
hi,
bertagaz wrote (02 Sep 2015 10:41:59 GMT) :
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:59:09PM +0200, anonym wrote:
>> On 09/01/2015 12:23 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> > bertagaz wrote (26 Aug 2015 17:52:26 GMT) :
>> Since pushing stuff into the branch after this field has been set to
>> true invalidates the Je
On 09/02/2015 01:12 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> hi,
>
> anonym wrote (02 Sep 2015 09:11:43 GMT) :
>> I got a video that was 309 MiB large [...]
>
> Assuming (very wild guess) that the size gain brought by the proposed
> changes from #10001 can be extrapolated, this could become 117 MiB.
> If that's mo
anonym wrote (01 Sep 2015 16:57:05 GMT) :
> Yes, per-scenario videos would be great (my plan was to do this when we
> have #8947, but whatever, nothing prevents us from having it now). They
> would be more useful than per-feature videos, and actually easier to
> implement AFAICT. Please file a tick
hi,
anonym wrote (02 Sep 2015 09:11:43 GMT) :
> I got a video that was 309 MiB large [...]
Assuming (very wild guess) that the size gain brought by the proposed
changes from #10001 can be extrapolated, this could become 117 MiB.
If that's mostly correct, then with an aggressive enough cleaning
po
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:59:09PM +0200, anonym wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 12:23 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> > bertagaz wrote (26 Aug 2015 17:52:26 GMT) :
> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:38:19PM +0200, anonym wrote:
> >>> The current proposal seems to be to only start the automated test run of
> >>> a feat
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:57:05PM +0200, anonym wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 12:04 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> > bertagaz wrote (28 Aug 2015 14:24:51 GMT) :
> >> I've also added a new section about the result to keep:
> >
> >> ## What kind of result shall be kept
> >
> >> The test suite produces diffe
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:04:39PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> bertagaz wrote (28 Aug 2015 14:24:51 GMT) :
> >
> > But then, often the screen capture are enought to identify why
> > a step failed to run.
>
> In my experience, sometimes, what would help understanding the problem
> has disappeare
On 09/01/2015 06:57 PM, anonym wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 12:04 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> bertagaz wrote (28 Aug 2015 14:24:51 GMT) :
>>> and might take quite a bit of disk space to store.
>>
>> ... and smaller (#10001). I'm curious how much space a full set of
>> test suite videos take.
>
> I'll try to
12 matches
Mail list logo
