[Tails-dev] Tor Monitor: don't show duplicate streams with the same destination in the same circuit

Hi, sajolida wrote: > Alan: > > intrigeri wrote: > >> sajolida wrote (27 Aug 2015 16:48:14 GMT) : > >>> C. Duplicate information > >> > >>> In the list of circuits I sometimes see duplicated lines. > >> > >> Technical nitpicking: these are streams, not circuits :) > >> > >>> For example when con

Re: [Tails-dev] [PATCH] Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "Boot"

On 09/11/2015 06:28 PM, spencer...@openmailbox.org wrote: > Hi, > >>> >>> Chris Lamb wrote: >>> Tails Tails (failsafe) >>> >>> We really need a verb here as I explain in my original patch. Whilst it >>> does remove the jargon this isn't much better than "Live" IMHO. >> >>

[Tails-dev] [PATCH] Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "Boot"

Hi, Chris Lamb wrote: Tails Tails (failsafe) We really need a verb here as I explain in my original patch. Whilst it does remove the jargon this isn't much better than "Live" IMHO. anonym: I agree with both points. I don't. User interaction *is* the v

Re: [Tails-dev] Testing Tor Monitor

Alan: > intrigeri wrote: >> sajolida wrote (27 Aug 2015 16:48:14 GMT) : >>> C. Duplicate information >> >>> In the list of circuits I sometimes see duplicated lines. >> >> Technical nitpicking: these are streams, not circuits :) >> >>> For example when connecting to heavy websites like YouTube. >>

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-ux] [PATCH] Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "Boot"

> Or what about verb + noun, i.e. "Start Tails" (and "Start Tails > (failsafe)")? I should have been clearer; this is what I was suggesting. :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-ux] [PATCH] Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "Boot"

On 09/11/2015 05:26 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:> Hi, > >> Tails >> Tails (failsafe) > > We really need a verb here as I explain in my original patch. Whilst it > does remove the jargon this isn't much better than "Live" IMHO. I agree with both points. > Did you have any specif

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-ux] [PATCH] Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "Boot"

Hi, > Tails > Tails (failsafe) We really need a verb here as I explain in my original patch. Whilst it does remove the jargon this isn't much better than "Live" IMHO. Did you have any specific objections to that? I'm not particularly bothered about which verb (eg. "Bo

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-ux] [PATCH] Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "Boot"

anonym: > On 09/09/2015 01:37 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: Hi Chris, thanks a lot for the patch! That's the first screen that people are confronted with but we never took the time to think much about it so I think it's a very good initiative. >> Attached is the following: >> >> commit 6c331780610f290d

Re: [Tails-dev] Avid Fan

Tim Almond: > Ahh that does make sense. What about similar software that would meet > compatibility, security & efficiency standards? If that would even be > beneficial to us as Tails users. I personally don't know of any. > I know this question might sound off subject, but what is your opinion o