sajolida:
> Giorgio Maone:
>> On 18/11/2015 19:54, sajolida wrote:
Meta: I created a bunch of tickets on Redmine to track all these pending
issues. Feel free to reassign them to tchou if you think that should be
on our plate, or to me for review (using "QA Check: Ready for QA").
>>> I read this t
Hi,
I'm putting tails-ux in copy but the implications of these mostly affect
development work so please answer on tails-dev.
Last week-end we did intensive testing of the current prototype for the
Installation Assistant. We spent 18 hours testing the whole process with
16 people and many findings
Muri Nicanor:
> in the monthly meeting yesterday we talked about the LHF sessions [0].
> i was at two or three of these in the last four or five month and there
> was noone there (although i must say, i didn't speak up, i just wanted
> to know what was happening there and jump in if it was interest
intrigeri:
> sajolida wrote (26 Nov 2015 13:36:52 GMT) :
B. Switch to "even for major releases / odd for minor ones", call the
first Tails/Jessie release 2.0, and then
> [...]
>> I agree with anonym. I don't mind doing the work needed for B.
>
> Yay, we've got a decision then!
>
>> A
Hi,
As we know finished deciding the release schedule for Tails Jessie, we
know that Tails 1.9 will indeed by Tails 2.0 (aka Tails Jessie).
So I moved all tickets marked for 1.9 to 2.0. But the freeze for 2.0 is
exceptionally very soon, on December 11 (even before Tails 1.8). So
please check the
Hi,
Adam Burns:
Uniquely identify each Tails image to assess and profile their usage
frequencies as per above?
I think that is called spying :)
Wordlife,
Spencer
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/ta
Thanks for the summary.
On 26/11/15 20:52, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> Tails does verify, that randomly chosen MAC does not equal the real MAC
> by chance.
>
> From tails-spoof-mac [1] (code: [A])
>
>> # There is a 1/2^24 chance macchanger will randomly pick the real MAC
>> # address. We try to m
