Re: [Tails-dev] Requirements for a Pidgin replacement

2016-02-08 Thread ghostlands
I think I lost track of the original message that started referencing the options according to letters :) I'd like to suggest an end alltogether of all-in-one communication clients. It may fit a Windows-style mode for use, but it contradicts one of the more elegant and sensible parts of the Un

[Tails-dev] GNOME infrastructure needs to ease tails development

2016-02-08 Thread Olav Vitters
Hello, During FOSDEM someone asked for an easier way to track GNOME bugs as that would help tails development. I asked him (forgot the name) to send an email to bugmas...@gnome.org, but didn't receive anything yet. Is that still wanted? I suggested to add a keyword. Ok and what should it be calle

[Tails-dev] Notes of the contributor-meeting-20160203

2016-02-08 Thread Spencer
Hi, Meeting Notes: segfault wants to rethink the installation and upgrade process Where is this being tracked? I would like to follow along if permitted (: Wordlife, Spencer ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.

[Tails-dev] [Tails - Feature #5991] Include BitTorrent software

2016-02-08 Thread Spencer
Hi, sajolida: join forces and coordinate on #9563 I closed #5991: Include BitTorrent Software, since #9563 addresses the issue. Wordlife, Spencer ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To uns

Re: [Tails-dev] ebuild for tails-installer

2016-02-08 Thread sajolida
Miguel Angel Marco Buzunariz: > If you want to include this information in the web page, and need > some further explanations, please contact me. The way our documentation (eg https://tails.boum.org/install/debian/usb) is built is both quite complicated and new. So I want to take some time to thin

[Tails-dev] Serverless chat [Was: Requirements for a Pidgin replacement]

2016-02-08 Thread intrigeri
ghostla...@autistici.org wrote (08 Feb 2016 09:01:59 GMT) : > Would this be an acceptable point to introduce the suggestion of a serverless > communicator of some kind being included? Yes, thanks for caring about this problem! Earlier in this thread we agreed to treat "D. One-to-one chat that pro

Re: [Tails-dev] Requirements for a Pidgin replacement

2016-02-08 Thread ghostlands
Would this be an acceptable point to introduce the suggestion of a serverless communicator of some kind being included? Uses should be obvious, but in case not, it eliminates some MITM options and reduces reliance on infrastructure outside the intended participants. Some examples: Tox - def