Re: [Tails-dev] Help required: test suite vs. Tor bootstrapping on buster

2020-07-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
intrigeri (2020-07-28): > That sounds annoying indeed! I'm happy to try to help. To do so, I'll > need the debug log (saved as debug.log by the test suite). Great, thanks. In the meanwhile, I had cleaned up all temporary directories, rebooted the machine, etc. to be extra sure. I've just started

Re: [Tails-dev] Help required: test suite vs. Tor bootstrapping on buster

2020-07-27 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Cyril Brulebois (2020-07-28): > I had noticed this during earlier release preps, but didn't get to the > bottom of it: with a buster system used exclusively for Tails purposes > (so no fancy extra packages installed), I cannot get the test suite to > get Tor bootstrapped: That sounds annoying

[Tails-dev] Help required: test suite vs. Tor bootstrapping on buster

2020-07-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, I had noticed this during earlier release preps, but didn't get to the bottom of it: with a buster system used exclusively for Tails purposes (so no fancy extra packages installed), I cannot get the test suite to get Tor bootstrapped: | Step failed while creating checkpoint: Tor is ready |

[Tails-dev] Requesting help: mass-unsubscribe from notifications

2020-07-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Having being responsible for a number of releases lately, I've been automatically “subscribed” to any tickets I ever touched, even if only to push back the target version (Redmine) / milestone (GitLab) to the next release. A bunch of such tickets were closed already, and aren't moving anymore

[Tails-dev] Help appreciated to investigate some Jenkins performance issue

2020-07-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Instead of building all IUKs serially on a single Jenkins worker, I've developed a proof of concept to trigger them all in parallel, across all workers. The downside is that it didn't seem obvious how to gather all results, so I went for a downstream job; for 4.9, jobs are: https://jenkins.t