Re: [Tails-dev] Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

d4d-20240414t1215z.iso 21f1a4fd4f098fccaef141c25dc67b18a185c38d42d8dfc14beeaa746b89f221 tails-arm64-6.2_raspi@dc0264f870+stable@fe2dd74d4d-20240414T1215Z.packages All the best! n9iu7pk PGP 7426 4598 B5AD 4D12 1699 C710 [ D602 E331 4D12 FFCB ] https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=D602E3314D12FFCB On 13.04.24 13:55,

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

roduceable) with "E: Release signed by unknown key (key id 2453AA9CE4123A9A)" - might be missleading / overlaying a HTTP 404 caused by my DNS hijack * I'll stop the builds for a while and will take some time to understand the build and your changes/commits better. All the best! n9iu7pk

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

e I can reproduce all builds (raspi, ashai and arm64) on a rp5 8GB. Best regards! n9iu7pk PGP 7426 4598 B5AD 4D12 1699 C710 [ D602 E331 4D12 FFCB ] https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=D602E3314D12FFCB ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

confused: base_branch defines, which branch will be cloned/used insde of the build VM while rake build. In case of "stable" even NOT the wip/raspi branch will be used to build, so how could a raspi image be build on "stable"? Best regards! n9iu7pk PGP 7426 4598 B5AD 4D12 16

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

ecurity for example isn't available unsecure with http:// but only secure https:// and thus must be rewritten - redirect http to https would require a TLS server setup - too much efforts. - forked from your/NoisyCoil's repository into https://gitlab.tails.boum.org/N9iu7pk/tails -> all chan

Re: [Tails-dev] FWD: Re: Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

regards! n9iu7pk Am 13.02.2024 18:52 schrieb noisyc...@tutanota.com: Hi there, I went for a DNS hack precisely so I could keep the patches to a minimum. All the relevant downloads are done via plain HTTP+signature verification, so in the end it was enough to disable a couple of points in the code

Re: [Tails-dev] FWD: Re: Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

y glad, if you could share more of your DNS hack (Years ago tried this with a local repo (instead of a DNS hack) with a mix of Debian arm packages and arm compiled tails packages - lot of config/script patches ...) Thanks in advance n9iu7pk On 12.02.24 00:47, NoisyCoil via Tails-dev wrote: A

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

est Regards n9iu7pk Am 20.01.2024 16:43 schrieb NoisyCoil via Tails-dev: *** For the casual reader: please do not use this version of Tails. This is just a developer preview, it won't protect you like official releases do *** Hey there, During the last few weeks I've been working on porting Ta

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails for arm64 (with support for Apple Silicon)

old stuff somewhere. However, I hope that I can support you in some way. Thanks for sharing your work, keep on! All the best! n9iu7pk Am 20.01.2024 16:43 schrieb NoisyCoil via Tails-dev: *** For the casual reader: please do not use this version of Tails. This is just a developer preview

[Tails-dev] [10972 - Port Tails To Arm] arm binary packages

Hi all, need help: - see https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/10972#note-80 - Debian's lb (live build) can't handle arm binary packages from arch:all, seems there's a binary-arm64 (or hf) binary node required. Or maybe I'm completely wrong with lb ... Regards n9iu7pk PGP 7426 4598 B5AD 4D12