sajolida:
> intrigeri:
>> flapflap wrote (03 Nov 2015 20:21:35 GMT) :
>>> What's the reason to mention "circuits and connections"; wouldn't just
>>> "circuits:" suffice? To me, this sounds redundant...
>>
>> Note that a circuit may be established without being used for
>> a connection
intrigeri:
> flapflap wrote (03 Nov 2015 20:21:35 GMT) :
>> What's the reason to mention "circuits and connections"; wouldn't just
>> "circuits:" suffice? To me, this sounds redundant...
>
> Note that a circuit may be established without being used for
> a connection (technically: a stream) yet.
flapflap wrote (03 Nov 2015 20:21:35 GMT) :
> What's the reason to mention "circuits and connections"; wouldn't just
> "circuits:" suffice? To me, this sounds redundant...
Note that a circuit may be established without being used for
a connection (technically: a stream) yet.
Cheers,
--
Hi,
while reviewing a translation, I stumbled across this part of the
documentation on Vidalia:
https://tails.boum.org/doc/anonymous_internet/vidalia/index.en.html#index3h1
"The Network Map feature displays information about the available Tor
relays and your established circuits and connections:"
