Hi,
[not sure why Chris and -ux@ are not Cc'ed anymore, but well]
sajolida wrote (12 Sep 2015 14:04:16 GMT) :
> We're talking about the "future" Greeter here. Where we already agree on
> saying "Start Tails". We wanted to avoid having the same label on two
> different screen (and feelings like "W
sajolida:
> anonym:
>> On 09/11/2015 06:28 PM, spencer...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
Thanks Chris for pointing the issue, it bothered me (a bit) for years!
>
[...]
>> If this is an argument against "Start Tails" I do not get it. :/ "Live"
>> is, of course, a terrible optio
anonym:
> On 09/11/2015 06:28 PM, spencer...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Tails
> Tails (failsafe)
We really need a verb here as I explain in my original patch. Whilst it
does remove the jargon this isn't much better than "Live" IMHO.
>
On 09/11/2015 06:28 PM, spencer...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>
>>> Chris Lamb wrote:
>>>
Tails
Tails (failsafe)
>>>
>>> We really need a verb here as I explain in my original patch. Whilst it
>>> does remove the jargon this isn't much better than "Live" IMHO.
>>
>>
Hi,
Chris Lamb wrote:
Tails
Tails (failsafe)
We really need a verb here as I explain in my original patch. Whilst
it
does remove the jargon this isn't much better than "Live" IMHO.
anonym:
I agree with both points.
I don't. User interaction *is* the v
On 09/09/2015 01:37 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
Thanks for your interest in Tails!
> Attached is the following:
>
> commit 6c331780610f290d495f9c77f16bf7263c4e0f2a
> Author: Chris Lamb
> Date: Wed Sep 9 00:26:54 2015 +0100
>
> Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "B
Hi,
Attached is the following:
commit 6c331780610f290d495f9c77f16bf7263c4e0f2a
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Wed Sep 9 00:26:54 2015 +0100
Change syslinux menu entries from "Live" to "Boot"
Having to explain what "Live" means so early on in the Tails
experience
