Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook

2014-10-08 Thread anonym
02/10/14 04:24, Kill Your TV wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:45:10 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: 27/09/14 12:53, Kill Your TV wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC) Would you merge this? :) BTW, I've personally tested this branch according to the new manual test steps

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook

2014-10-02 Thread Kill Your TV
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:45:10 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: 27/09/14 12:53, Kill Your TV wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC) As to your update to the manual test suite in commit dcc88ff, it again introduces interdependency to feature/7725-i2p-browser since it talks

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook

2014-09-30 Thread anonym
27/09/14 12:53, Kill Your TV wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: 26/09/14 14:31, Kill Your TV wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: Similarly we can remove

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook

2014-09-27 Thread Kill Your TV
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: 26/09/14 14:31, Kill Your TV wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: First, you haven't removed the `config/chroot_local-includes/usr/local/bin/tails-start-i2p` script,

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook [was: I2P Tails 1.2 (0.9.15, browser, network-manager))

2014-09-27 Thread Kill Your TV
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: One last thing, a nice bonus would be upgraded manual test steps in the I2P section of `wiki/src/contribute/release_process/test.mdwn I pushed something for this as well, perhaps it's satisfactory. -- GPG ID:

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook [was: I2P Tails 1.2 (0.9.15, browser, network-manager))

2014-09-26 Thread Kill Your TV
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: First, you haven't removed the `config/chroot_local-includes/usr/local/bin/tails-start-i2p` script, which imho now is obsolete. Correct. I didn't remove it in case others thought that what I came up with was subpar.

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook [was: I2P Tails 1.2 (0.9.15, browser, network-manager))

2014-09-26 Thread anonym
26/09/14 14:31, Kill Your TV wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC) anonym ano...@riseup.net wrote: First, you haven't removed the `config/chroot_local-includes/usr/local/bin/tails-start-i2p` script, which imho now is obsolete. Correct. I didn't remove it in case others thought

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook [was: I2P Tails 1.2 (0.9.15, browser, network-manager))

2014-09-25 Thread anonym
22/09/14 00:56, Kill Your TV wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:02:24 + (UTC) Kill Your TV killyou...@i2pmail.org wrote: Network-Manager === Beginning with Tails 1.1.1, users need to explicitly ask for I2P at the boot prompt. Users still need to start I2P from the menu. Since a

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook [

2014-09-25 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (26 Sep 2014 02:46:31 GMT) : A difference compared to the old `tails-start-i2p` is that it opens the router console in the web browser (starting it if necessary) once it's ready (simply by waiting for port 7657 to start listening) but your script doesn't. IMHO it's a pretty

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/7732-i2p-network-manager-hook [

2014-09-25 Thread anonym
26/09/14 06:12, intrigeri wrote: hi, anonym wrote (26 Sep 2014 02:46:31 GMT) : A difference compared to the old `tails-start-i2p` is that it opens the router console in the web browser (starting it if necessary) once it's ready (simply by waiting for port 7657 to start listening) but your