02/10/14 04:24, Kill Your TV wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:45:10 + (UTC)
> anonym wrote:
>
>> 27/09/14 12:53, Kill Your TV wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC)
>> Would you merge this? :) BTW, I've personally
>> tested this branch according to the new manual test steps of thi
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:45:10 + (UTC)
anonym wrote:
> 27/09/14 12:53, Kill Your TV wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC)
> As to your update to the manual test suite in commit dcc88ff, it again
> introduces interdependency to feature/7725-i2p-browser since it talks
> about the "
27/09/14 12:53, Kill Your TV wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC)
> anonym wrote:
>
>> 26/09/14 14:31, Kill Your TV wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC)
>>> anonym wrote:
Similarly we can remove
`config/chroot_local-includes/usr/share/applications/i2p.deskt
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC)
anonym wrote:
> One last thing, a nice bonus would be upgraded manual test steps in
> the "I2P" section of `wiki/src/contribute/release_process/test.mdwn
I pushed something for this as well, perhaps it's satisfactory.
--
GPG ID: 0x5BF72F42D0952C5A
Finger
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:25:16 + (UTC)
anonym wrote:
> 26/09/14 14:31, Kill Your TV wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC)
> > anonym wrote:
> >
> >> First, you haven't removed the
> >> `config/chroot_local-includes/usr/local/bin/tails-start-i2p`
> >> script, which imho now is ob
26/09/14 14:31, Kill Your TV wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC)
> anonym wrote:
>
>> First, you haven't removed the
>> `config/chroot_local-includes/usr/local/bin/tails-start-i2p` script,
>> which imho now is obsolete.
>
> Correct. I didn't remove it in case others thought that wh
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:46:42 + (UTC)
anonym wrote:
> First, you haven't removed the
> `config/chroot_local-includes/usr/local/bin/tails-start-i2p` script,
> which imho now is obsolete.
Correct. I didn't remove it in case others thought that what I came up
with was "subpar".
> Similarly we
26/09/14 06:12, intrigeri wrote:
> hi,
>
> anonym wrote (26 Sep 2014 02:46:31 GMT) :
>> A difference compared to the old `tails-start-i2p` is that it opens the
>> router console in the web browser (starting it if necessary) once it's
>> ready (simply by waiting for port 7657 to start listening) bu
hi,
anonym wrote (26 Sep 2014 02:46:31 GMT) :
> A difference compared to the old `tails-start-i2p` is that it opens the
> router console in the web browser (starting it if necessary) once it's
> ready (simply by waiting for port 7657 to start listening) but your
> script doesn't. IMHO it's a prett
22/09/14 00:56, Kill Your TV wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:02:24 + (UTC)
> Kill Your TV wrote:
>
>> Network-Manager
>> ===
>>
>> Beginning with Tails 1.1.1, users need to explicitly ask for I2P at
>> the boot prompt. Users still need to start I2P from the menu. Since a
>> user t
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:02:24 + (UTC)
Kill Your TV wrote:
> Network-Manager
> ===
>
> Beginning with Tails 1.1.1, users need to explicitly ask for I2P at
> the boot prompt. Users still need to start I2P from the menu. Since a
> user that enters "i2p" as a boot option is clearly in
11 matches
Mail list logo
