Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9560-tor-0.2.6.9

2015-07-01 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (28 Jun 2015 16:28:03 GMT) : > bertagaz wrote (28 Jun 2015 16:02:58 GMT) : >> I can do some reviews tomorrow morning, hopefully both, but happy to see >> if Alan manage to do some too. :) > Excellent. Then, please assign one of those tickets to you. Did anyone review this yet, and

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9560-tor-0.2.6.9

2015-06-28 Thread intrigeri
bertagaz wrote (28 Jun 2015 16:02:58 GMT) : > I can do some reviews tomorrow morning, hopefully both, but happy to see > if Alan manage to do some too. :) Excellent. Then, please assign one of those tickets to you. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev ma

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9560-tor-0.2.6.9

2015-06-28 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 03:53:50PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very sorry to come up with this request this late in the cycle, > but we should really upgrade Tor to its latest version. I had started > doing it a couple weeks ago but my package lacked a patch (because the > release doc ha

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/9560-tor-0.2.6.9

2015-06-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, I'm very sorry to come up with this request this late in the cycle, but we should really upgrade Tor to its latest version. I had started doing it a couple weeks ago but my package lacked a patch (because the release doc hadn't been updated after we decided to include said patch, gah). I resum