Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge doc/7216-persistence-backup-permissions

2014-06-30 Thread intrigeri
Hi, sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (29 Jun 2014 11:27:17 GMT) : I think what's wrong here is your understanding of the problem. Definitely. It seems the root of the misunderstanding was a nomenclature clash: I was reading the ticket with the Unix nomenclature filter on (my default one, at least

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge doc/7216-persistence-backup-permissions

2014-06-29 Thread sajolida
intrigeri wrote: I'm sorry, but I don't get how this can be a solution to the problem described on that ticket. IMO either the description of the problem is wrong, or the solution is wrong. Replied there. I think what's wrong here is your understanding of the problem. I already tested that

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge doc/7216-persistence-backup-permissions

2014-06-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, I'm sorry, but I don't get how this can be a solution to the problem described on that ticket. IMO either the description of the problem is wrong, or the solution is wrong. Replied there. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list

[Tails-dev] Please review and merge doc/7216-persistence-backup-permissions

2014-06-27 Thread sajolida
Ticket: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7216 Branch: doc/7216-persistence-backup-permissions Target: testing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org