On 7/21/14, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
(Created https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7639 to track this all.)
Thanks!
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (21 Jul 2014 19:54:57 GMT) :
On 7/21/14, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
However, removing modules altogether is no more work than
Hi,
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (22 Jul 2014 08:34:59 GMT) :
On 7/21/14, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (21 Jul 2014 19:54:57 GMT) :
Is that true? Isn't blacklisting them as simple as adding a few lines
to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf?
Right. Which is not much easier
Hi,
Jurre van Bergen wrote (11 Jul 2014 15:20:22 GMT) :
I feel that it's important to reconsider what we would like to ship
in Tails as the more kernel modules we load and/or ship we also
increase the attack vector.
Fine with me, as there seems to be energy willing to be put into
this :)
I
On 7/21/14, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
Jurre van Bergen wrote (11 Jul 2014 15:20:22 GMT) :
I feel that it's important to reconsider what we would like to ship
in Tails as the more kernel modules we load and/or ship we also
increase the attack vector.
Fine with me, as there
Hi,
(Created https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7639 to track this all.)
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (21 Jul 2014 19:54:57 GMT) :
On 7/21/14, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
However, removing modules altogether is no more work than blacklisting
them: we can do it either via chroot_local-hooks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
By default Debian ships a beautiful kernel with a ton of features to
work outside of the box. With features I mean modules, whether that's
support for some really obscure network protocol or bluetooth(random
example) drivers. While that comes in
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:50:22AM +0930, Jurre van Bergen wrote:
Hi,
By default Debian ships a beautiful kernel with a ton of features to
work outside of the box. With features I mean modules, whether that's
support for some really obscure network protocol or bluetooth(random
example)
