Re: [Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 Failed

2017-09-04 Thread anonym
Andres Pavez: > Hi, > I have failed trying to reproduce Tails 3.1. I got a iso with a different > hash. > Then, I was able to successfully reproduce the failed iso again with > the same hash. > > Attached you will find the info, I hope helps to improve the > reproduction of Tails. Thanks! Make n

[Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 Failed

2017-09-02 Thread Andres Pavez
Hi, I have failed trying to reproduce Tails 3.1. I got a iso with a different hash. Then, I was able to successfully reproduce the failed iso again with the same hash. Attached you will find the info, I hope helps to improve the reproduction of Tails. In summary: - I used a new machine with debia

Re: [Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 Failed

2017-08-14 Thread Shawn Nock
I cleared the build products and ran rake build again, the result was the same. diffoscope output attached. --- /home/nock/tails-amd64-3.1.iso +++ tails-amd64-3.1.iso ├── live/filesystem.squashfs │ ├── unsquashfs -d '' -lls {} │ │ @@ -1169,15 +1169,15 @@ │ │ -rw-r--r-- root/root 17

Re: [Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 failed

2017-08-13 Thread anonym
Thanks for participating! I had a quick look at the diffoscope output, and you are hit (only) by the known issue of "Various .cache files not reproducible in some environments" (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/12740). Hopefully we can collect a few more system-info* of systems hit by this b

Re: [Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 Failed

2017-08-13 Thread anonym
Thanks for participating! So the problem in your ISO image is that /etc/hostname gets all executable bits set, which shouldn't happen. I've filed this as: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/13623 nock, it'd be interesting to see if you can reproduce this issue again. So, can you please retry

Re: [Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 failed

2017-08-11 Thread u
Hi Kevin, thank you very much. > note that I did redact a number of environment variables as well as the > hostname from the system-info output. I would be glad to share the > redacted contents privately if they turn out to be relevant. You can send the unredacted version to ta...@boum.org whi

Re: [Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 Failed

2017-08-11 Thread u
Hi Shawn, thank you very much. We will collect some more feedback and will send an update out when we have made progress. Cheers! u. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list,

Re: [Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 Failed

2017-08-10 Thread Shawn Nock
Attached updated diffoscope 85 installed manually. system-info.txt.bz2 Description: Binary data diffoscope.txt.bz2 Description: Binary data ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from

[Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 failed

2017-08-09 Thread Kevin Beranek
I attempted to reproduce Tails 3.1 on an Ubuntu 17.04 x86_64 machine following the instructions sent to tor-...@lists.torproject.org [1]. The resulting sha512sum of tails-amd64-3.1.iso (shown below) is different from the expected result, but is consistent on my machine if I follow the same instruc

[Tails-dev] Reproduction of Tails 3.1 Failed

2017-08-09 Thread Shawn Nock
system-info.txt.bz2 Description: Binary data diffoscope.txt.bz2 Description: Binary data ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubsc