Re: [Tails-dev] Reverting defacement on blueprint

2015-10-28 Thread sajolida
Jesse W: > The defacement is listed as being authored by localhost (127.0.0.1@web), > which has 13,538 commits attributed to it, although all but 2,288 of > them point to the same tree as their parent (i.e. they contain no actual > change). All these commits are the ones done through the web

Re: [Tails-dev] Reverting defacement on blueprint

2015-10-27 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Jesse W wrote (27 Oct 2015 01:53:17 GMT) : > I didn't know we accept anonymous edits to the wiki -- it is certainly > not documented anywhere I've seen... FTR, the closest we have to documentation is in ikiwiki-cgi.setup (that closely follows the actual config file used by the production

Re: [Tails-dev] Reverting defacement on blueprint

2015-10-26 Thread Jesse W
The defacement is listed as being authored by localhost (127.0.0.1@web), which has 13,538 commits attributed to it, although all but 2,288 of them point to the same tree as their parent (i.e. they contain no actual change). Of the ones with changes, they all are in the wiki, and were authored

[Tails-dev] Reverting defacement on blueprint

2015-10-26 Thread sajolida
Today while fetching from origin I had to revert a defacement on a blueprint. See b2b585b and 19a3de4. If anybody wants to investigate this further... People with the commit bit: beware of what you're pulling from origin :) This one was easy but I hope it won't get more sophisticated...

Re: [Tails-dev] Reverting defacement on blueprint

2015-10-26 Thread intrigeri
sajolida wrote (26 Oct 2015 12:42:47 GMT) : > Today while fetching from origin I had to revert a defacement [...] Thanks for handling that. > If anybody wants to investigate this further... What do you think could/should be investigated? > People with the commit bit: beware of what you're