Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2018-05-22 Thread iry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 intrigeri: > I think the new torrc.d/ directory support would help: you could > make that directory persistent and drop files in it. > > We don't include that directory at the moment > (https://bugs.debian.org/866187) but if that's something you ne

Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2018-05-21 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Conor Schaefer: > On 12/14/2017 02:31 AM, sajolida wrote: > Fair points. With the (Tails-based) SecureDrop Journalist Workstation, > we're already shoehorning a lot of persistence into the environment, > which I count as going against the grain of the primary use case of > Tails. For instance,

Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2017-12-16 Thread sajolida
Loic Dachary: >> Loic Dachary: >>> * Adding a software distribution channel to a Qubes workstation is >>> easy while creating and distributing tails derivatives is >>> challenging and discouraged >> >> I agree with "challenging". I partly disagree with "discouraged". > > I meant to say I was disc

Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2017-12-15 Thread Conor Schaefer
On 12/14/2017 02:31 AM, sajolida wrote: > > Thanks for starting this discussion! Great conversation, Loic, thanks also for getting the ball rolling. > >> First of all this is not something new: people asked for it long ago >> but Qubes was not mature enough. The upcoming Qubes version 4 >> change

Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2017-12-14 Thread Loic Dachary
On 12/14/2017 01:00 PM, u wrote: > Hi! > > Loic Dachary: >> On 12/14/2017 11:31 AM, sajolida wrote: >>> Loic Dachary: It was suggested to launch a thread (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15052#note-3) about the reasons why SecureDrop is working on a Qubes based workstation f

Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2017-12-14 Thread u
Hi! Loic Dachary: > On 12/14/2017 11:31 AM, sajolida wrote: >> Loic Dachary: >>> It was suggested to launch a thread >>> (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15052#note-3) about the reasons >>> why SecureDrop is working on a Qubes based workstation for >>> journalists as an alternative to using

Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2017-12-14 Thread Loic Dachary
On 12/14/2017 11:31 AM, sajolida wrote: > Loic Dachary: >> It was suggested to launch a thread >> (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15052#note-3) about the reasons >> why SecureDrop is working on a Qubes based workstation for >> journalists as an alternative to using an airgap tails. Conor

Re: [Tails-dev] SecureDrop and Tails vs Qubes

2017-12-14 Thread sajolida
Loic Dachary: > It was suggested to launch a thread > (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15052#note-3) about the reasons > why SecureDrop is working on a Qubes based workstation for > journalists as an alternative to using an airgap tails. Conor & Jen > are cc'ed so they can comment on this.

[Tails-dev] SecureDrop and tails vs Qubes

2017-12-13 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi, It was suggested to launch a thread (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15052#note-3) about the reasons why SecureDrop is working on a Qubes based workstation for journalists as an alternative to using an airgap tails. Conor & Jen are cc'ed so they can comment on this. First of all this