Hi,
sajolida:
> intrigeri:
>>> Second, a coming feature that allows users to get Tor Bridges from Tor
>>> launcher/anon-connection-wizard relies on it.
>>
>> Right. I *think* we have this on our radar, and possibly even on our
>> roadmap (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/14555 perhaps).
>>
intrigeri:
>> Second, a coming feature that allows users to get Tor Bridges from Tor
>> launcher/anon-connection-wizard relies on it.
>
> Right. I *think* we have this on our radar, and possibly even on our
> roadmap (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/14555 perhaps).
> I'll check once I get
Hi iry!
iry:
> I am curious about why meek is not available in Tails.
For those following from home, since you asked, the status has been
clarified there:
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/8243
> I am asking this because meek is really important from at least two
> aspects
> Second, a
Hi,
u:
> iry:
>> I am curious about why meek is not available in Tails. My guess is
>> Tails prefers running meek as a standalone application, which is not
>> the case so far? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=76400
>> 7
> We'd like to have meek in Tails, and we even have a
Hi!
iry:
> I am curious about why meek is not available in Tails. My guess is
> Tails prefers running meek as a standalone application, which is not
> the case so far? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=76400
> 7
We'd like to have meek in Tails, and we even have a ticket about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Tails Developers!
In Tails document, it says:
> Tails allows you to use bridges of the following types:
>
> bridge obfs2 obfs3 obfs4 ScrambleSuit
I am curious about why meek is not available in Tails. My guess is
Tails prefers running meek as
