Hi!
I made the assumption, that you'd like to have more people improving
documentation and thought may like to get feedback if someone feels
that something prevents people from contributing, like I do.
Taking this as an example todo item:
https://tails.boum.org/todo/document_timezone/
Looks fair
On 14/03/13 19:38, adrelanos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made the assumption, that you'd like to have more people improving
> documentation and thought may like to get feedback if someone feels
> that something prevents people from contributing, like I do.
Yes, that would be great to have more people writ
sajol...@pimienta.org:
> On 14/03/13 19:38, adrelanos wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I made the assumption, that you'd like to have more people improving
>> documentation and thought may like to get feedback if someone feels
>> that something prevents people from contributing, like I do.
>
> Yes, that would
>> A much more reliable way to do so it to
>> be open to contributions, review them and publish them once they are
>> mature.
>
> Yes, agreed. That is a good compromise. In wikipedia they (used to) have
> a feature called sighted versions / flagged revisions. In essence,
> causal visitors will se
sajol...@pimienta.org:
>
>>> A much more reliable way to do so it to be open to
>>> contributions, review them and publish them once they are
>>> mature.
>>
>> Yes, agreed. That is a good compromise. In wikipedia they (used
>> to) have a feature called sighted versions / flagged revisions.
>> In
Hi,
adrelanos wrote (02 Jul 2013 23:04:55 GMT) :
> Proposing content in the wiki just doesn't work out, probable because
> the spam filter kicks in and forbids transmission due to many links.
What makes you think so?
> I ended up with a gateway took to long error, which I'll paste below
> in quo
intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> adrelanos wrote (02 Jul 2013 23:04:55 GMT) :
>> Proposing content in the wiki just doesn't work out, probable because
>> the spam filter kicks in and forbids transmission due to many links.
>
> What makes you think so?
I am probable wrong, just because I had trouble adding l
Hi,
adrelanos wrote (05 Jul 2013 16:25:37 GMT) :
The gateway did not receive a timely response from the upstream
server or application. Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at
tails.boum.org Port 443
>>
>> This looks like a "server busy" problem much more than a spam filter
>> false posit
intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> adrelanos wrote (05 Jul 2013 16:25:37 GMT) :
> The gateway did not receive a timely response from the
> upstream server or application. Apache/2.2.22 (Debian)
> Server at tails.boum.org Port 443
>>>
>>> This looks like a "server busy" problem much more than a spam
Hi,
On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:34:30 +0200 intrigeri
wrote:
>
> adrelanos wrote (05 Jul 2013 16:25:37 GMT) :
>
> > Still having the same issue.
>
> I could reproduce that, and got the same error message, but in the end
> my changes *are* saved: only the wiki update was not finished within
> the Ap
Hi,
Alan wrote (06 Jul 2013 15:35:40 GMT) :
> However, it will probably become irrelevent as soon as we switch to
> redmine to track issues. Does anybody has an idea when it will
> happen ?
Soon.
> If it is "soon", I propose we ignore the issue.
Yes.
11 matches
Mail list logo
