Hi,
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (13 Dec 2012 12:20:38 GMT) :
> I'm still ready and excited about writing documentation for that.
> I can commit to doing it before the freeze of the 24th of January
> but not before.
Excellent. Feel free to ask if you need anything from my side.
Cheers,
--
intr
On 14/11/12 11:07, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (27 Sep 2012 07:24:38 GMT) :
>> I think I'll want to prepare and publish an IUK for 0.14, and have
>> some early testers try it.
>
> Write user documentation [4] and hand it to translators.
> sajolida, do you want/pla
18/11/12 11:42, intrigeri wrote:
>> I know a progress bar is planned (I looked around in the ticket),
>> but due to my experience above I think it's an absolute must that
>> it's implemented before we announce this feature publicly.
>
> I now agree it's a must before this feature is enabled by def
hi,
anonym wrote (16 Nov 2012 12:45:44 GMT) :
> I tested this for 0.14~rc2 to 0.14, and all went smoothly.
Thanks a lot for testing. I think this is the first time someone else
than me tries the incremental upgrade process. I'm happy it went well.
> I know a progress bar is planned (I looked aro
14/11/12 11:07, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (27 Sep 2012 07:24:38 GMT) :
>> I think I'll want to prepare and publish an IUK for 0.14, and have
>> some early testers try it.
>
> Update-description files and an IUK from 0.14~rc2 to 0.14 are now in
> place, and can be tested. Please d
Ague Mill wrote (14 Nov 2012 18:40:02 GMT) :
> Is there any reasons not to fix this before 0.15~rc1?
Done in devel yesterday: 9a84d94.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intriger
intrigeri:
> 3. Apply that patch to fix our newly-hardened firewall configuration:
>
>diff --git a/config/chroot_local-includes/etc/ferm/ferm.conf
> b/config/chroot_local-includes/etc/ferm/ferm.conf
>index 234aa04..cd36159 100644
>--- a/config/chroot_local-includes/etc/ferm/ferm.conf
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (27 Sep 2012 07:24:38 GMT) :
> I think I'll want to prepare and publish an IUK for 0.14, and have
> some early testers try it.
Update-description files and an IUK from 0.14~rc2 to 0.14 are now in
place, and can be tested. Please do test them.
Sadly, the IUK is huge (150MB) du
Hi,
(thank you for following-up :)
a...@boum.org wrote (26 Sep 2012 17:43:09 GMT) :
>> > 2. When 0.13.x point-releases are out, write developers
>> > documentation and tools, prepare IUK, update update-description
>> > files, ask beta testers to try the incremental upgrade process.
>>
Hi,
> > So, I'm proposing the following plan to release this feature:
> >
I think we agreed on this proposal.
> > 1. As soon as possible, merge into devel the harmless part of the
> > feature/incremental-upgrades branch (users creation with sudo
> > credentials, dependencies install
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:38:15AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> 1. As soon as possible, merge into devel the harmless part of the
> feature/incremental-upgrades branch (users creation with sudo
> credentials, dependencies installation), leaving aside the part
> about running the updat
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (23 Aug 2012 09:51:08 GMT) :
> Is that any better?
> “ The system was successfully updated.
> The Tails partition on the USB stick is not write-
> protected anymore for this working session. This is not safe, and
> you should restart Tails as soon as possible.
>
On 21/08/12 21:52, intrigeri wrote:
>> ## Line 319
>
>> "The system was successfully updated."
>> "It is now running in a special mode which is not safe for normal use."
>> "You should reboot as soon as possible."
>> "Shutdown the system now?"
>
>> → "The system was successfully updated."
>> "It
hi,
sajolida wrote (08 Aug 2012 12:29:53 GMT) :
> I'll propose and comment a few changes here.
Thanks a lot!
> # Frontend.pm
> ## Line 298
> "Target files for %{name}s %{version}s are being downloaded, please wait."
> → "Downloading the update for %{name}s %{version}s, please wait."
Applied.
On 03/08/12 19:33, intrigeri wrote:
> hi,
>
> sajolida wrote (27 Jul 2012 09:02:43 GMT) :
>> Yes! I would be happy to work on that.
>
> Great!
>
>> Sounds like a great plan. Regarding the documentation, and to have
>> a bit more loose schedule we could write a first documentation in
>> time for
hi,
sajolida wrote (27 Jul 2012 09:02:43 GMT) :
> Yes! I would be happy to work on that.
Great!
> Sounds like a great plan. Regarding the documentation, and to have
> a bit more loose schedule we could write a first documentation in
> time for 0.13.x but then ask for translations only after a fi
On 24/07/12 04:38, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first phase of the incremental upgrades feature [0] development
> is nearing completion.
>
> Today, inside a Tails system, I ran [1] the update frontend against
> a local web server that handed an update-description file along with
> a matching IU
Hi,
the first phase of the incremental upgrades feature [0] development
is nearing completion.
Today, inside a Tails system, I ran [1] the update frontend against
a local web server that handed an update-description file along with
a matching IUK. I was asked graphically if I wanted to upgrade my
18 matches
Mail list logo
