intrigeri:
> sycamoreone wrote (21 Jul 2016 09:57:00 GMT) :
>> > I am not sure if this is a bug actually, but would suggest that
>> > tails-installer should properly depend (directly or indirectly) on all
>> > the tools necessary to do its job.
> Right.
>
> That's https://bugs.debian.org/814489,
>
Hi!
intrigeri:
> sycamoreone wrote (21 Jul 2016 09:57:00 GMT) :
>> I am not sure if this is a bug actually, but would suggest that
>> tails-installer should properly depend (directly or indirectly) on all
>> the tools necessary to do its job.
>
> Right.
>
> That's https://bugs.debian.org/814489,
sycamoreone wrote (21 Jul 2016 09:57:00 GMT) :
> I am not sure if this is a bug actually, but would suggest that
> tails-installer should properly depend (directly or indirectly) on all
> the tools necessary to do its job.
Right.
That's https://bugs.debian.org/814489,
which has been fixed in Git
Hi,
the tails-installer package in Debian Jessie depends on the 'syslinux'
package, which recommends the 'syslinux-common' package. The later
package won't get installed as a dependency of tails-installer, if
somebody has something like 'Apt::Install-Recommends "false";' in a
config file, which se
