anonym wrote (25 Oct 2012 17:05:41 GMT) :
Personally I believe it's about the best we can do for now. Please merge.
Done.
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Hi,
static review: I'm fine with the current branch content.
anonym, shall I test and merge it into testing, or is there anything
you wanted to do first?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
25/10/12 12:43, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
static review: I'm fine with the current branch content.
anonym, shall I test and merge it into testing, or is there anything
you wanted to do first?
Personally I believe it's about the best we can do for now. Please merge.
Cheers!
Hi,
anonym wrote (16 Oct 2012 13:17:06 GMT) :
commit 87622e4c7e1a3b5c80e67141de7947d0304b6f31
Author: Nick Mathewson ni...@torproject.org
Date: Mon Nov 14 22:21:45 2011 -0500
Allow up to a 30 days future skew, 48 hours past skew in certs.
In other words, Tor will now back off on the
hi,
anonym wrote (18 Oct 2012 11:18:43 GMT) :
Implemented in bugfix/tordate_vs_tor_0.2.3.x
Looks good.
I'm worried about the reliance on exact log messages wording,
but well...
Here follows some nitpicking on implementation details.
I'm in doubt with the grep -m 1 on Tor log file: don't we
anonym wrote (16 Oct 2012 13:17:06 GMT) :
What do you think?
I probably won't have time to seriously think about this before
Sunday. I say go ahead with an initial implementation unless someone
reacts today.
___
tails-dev mailing list
18/10/12 10:54, intrigeri wrote:
anonym wrote (16 Oct 2012 13:17:06 GMT) :
What do you think?
I probably won't have time to seriously think about this before
Sunday. I say go ahead with an initial implementation unless someone
reacts today.
Implemented in bugfix/tordate_vs_tor_0.2.3.x
15/10/12 18:23, anonym wrote:
But running that test without Host-to-Guest time syncing will fail since
Tor won't write an unverified-microdesc-consensus like it used to write
a unverified-consensus prior to Tor 0.2.3.x. wait_on_tor_consensus()
will hence never succeed. The use of
Hi,
When I ran the test suite for Tails 0.14~rc1 I seem to have made a
mistake by passing a test which didn't pass. The test in question is the
Time test:
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/release_process/test/#index10h1
While running the test suite I ran several tests in parallel (to be
