Jurre van Bergen wrote (11 Feb 2016 00:20:58 GMT) :
> On 02/11/2016 12:06 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Anyone wants to try out Subgraph Application Firewall (fw-daemon) in
>> the context of Tails?
> Let's see if I can do something here. I'll document a long the way.
Woohoo! I suggest starting with a
On 02/11/2016 12:06 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Anyone wants to try out Subgraph Application Firewall (fw-daemon) in
> the context of Tails?
Let's see if I can do something here. I'll document a long the way.
Best,
Jurre
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Hi,
[given this is an old thread, I'll be quoting more widely than usual.]
anonym wrote (02 Dec 2014 13:10:53 GMT) :
> I think there arguments both for and against allowing post-session
> security decisions (and I'm trying to be a bit more general here):
> * Pro 1: if people are frequently
On 03/11/14 23:42, Jurre van Bergen wrote:
On 11/02/2014 12:48 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (24 Jul 2014 01:16:26 GMT) :
I've waited a while for folks to read it and I think at this point,
we're at year two or so of waiting. It seems like the easy thing is to
simply give
Jurre van Bergen wrote:
1) When I boot Tails, i'm presented with an option to allow local
traffic or not.
Do you mean *all* local traffic here?
2) When I boot Tails, i'm presented with an option to allow certain
local traffic like SSH and printing and the rest not.
... in contrast with this
On 11/02/2014 12:48 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (24 Jul 2014 01:16:26 GMT) :
I've waited a while for folks to read it and I think at this point,
we're at year two or so of waiting. It seems like the easy thing is to
simply give up and advocate for a fix with a simple
