intrigeri:
> Jurre van Bergen wrote (11 Feb 2016 00:20:58 GMT) :
>> On 02/11/2016 12:06 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>>> Anyone wants to try out Subgraph Application Firewall (fw-daemon) in
>>> the context of Tails?
>> Let's see if I can do something here. I'll document a long the way.
> Woohoo! I suggest
Jurre van Bergen wrote (11 Feb 2016 00:20:58 GMT) :
> On 02/11/2016 12:06 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Anyone wants to try out Subgraph Application Firewall (fw-daemon) in
>> the context of Tails?
> Let's see if I can do something here. I'll document a long the way.
Woohoo! I suggest starting with a ve
On 02/11/2016 12:06 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Anyone wants to try out Subgraph Application Firewall (fw-daemon) in
> the context of Tails?
Let's see if I can do something here. I'll document a long the way.
Best,
Jurre
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev
Hi,
[given this is an old thread, I'll be quoting more widely than usual.]
anonym wrote (02 Dec 2014 13:10:53 GMT) :
> I think there arguments both for and against allowing post-session
> security decisions (and I'm trying to be a bit more general here):
> * Pro 1: if people are frequently frust
Jurre van Bergen:
> I'm not an UX person but I see the following solution(s) living next to
> each other if needed. Coming from a security point of view, I believe
> it's better to enable things than to disable things. Most of our users
> might not understand the risks associated to attacks describ
On 03/11/14 23:42, Jurre van Bergen wrote:
> On 11/02/2014 12:48 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (24 Jul 2014 01:16:26 GMT) :
>>> I've waited a while for folks to read it and I think at this point,
>>> we're at year two or so of waiting. It seems like the easy thing is to
>>
Jurre van Bergen wrote:
> 1) When I boot Tails, i'm presented with an option to allow local
> traffic or not.
Do you mean *all* local traffic here?
> 2) When I boot Tails, i'm presented with an option to allow certain
> local traffic like SSH and printing and the rest not.
... in contrast with t
On 11/02/2014 12:48 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (24 Jul 2014 01:16:26 GMT) :
>> I've waited a while for folks to read it and I think at this point,
>> we're at year two or so of waiting. It seems like the easy thing is to
>> simply give up and advocate for a fix with a simp
