Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-testers] Request for JavaFX on Tails 3.0

2017-04-12 Thread sajolida
intrigeri: > Hi Collin, > > Collin Sullivan: > I'll assume that the package Martus needs is either > libopenjfx-java or libopenjfx-jni. > >> When I tested this, it appeared that both were required for openjfx to >> run. Marking either for removal also marked openjfx for removal. > >>>

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-testers] Request for JavaFX on Tails 3.0

2017-04-12 Thread intrigeri
Hi Collin, Collin Sullivan: I'll assume that the package Martus needs is either libopenjfx-java or libopenjfx-jni. > When I tested this, it appeared that both were required for openjfx to > run. Marking either for removal also marked openjfx for removal. >> OK, please let us know once

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-testers] Request for JavaFX on Tails 3.0

2017-03-03 Thread Collin Sullivan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello hello, >>> I'll assume that the package Martus needs is either >>> libopenjfx-java or libopenjfx-jni. When I tested this, it appeared that both were required for openjfx to run. Marking either for removal also marked openjfx for removal.

Re: [Tails-dev] [Tails-testers] Request for JavaFX on Tails 3.0

2017-01-11 Thread intrigeri
Hi, [moving this discussion to tails-dev@] Collin Sullivan: > On 1/7/17 1:32 AM, intrigeri wrote: >> I'll assume that the package Martus needs is either libopenjfx-java >> or libopenjfx-jni. > I'll need to confirm with some of the devs on my side. When we were > experimenting with custom Tails