Stewart is absolutely correct.
Making this online reference far from a suitable means of clearing up
anything regarding rMS as a person.
Kare
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, Stewart Russell via talk wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 10:21, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk
wrote:
The article seems to be
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 10:21, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk
wrote:
>
> The article seems to be mostly limited to non-controversial and positive
> things. It seems to be written very sympathetically. That's probably
> appropriate.
>
Britannica doesn't really rank as a quality reference work. It
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, 10:21 AM D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk,
wrote:
> | From: Russell Reiter via talk
> |
> | I stumbled across this. I think it's concise and well written. Cuts
> through
> | the fud pretty well.
> |
> | https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-Stallman
>
> I don't know
| From: Russell Reiter via talk
|
| I stumbled across this. I think it's concise and well written. Cuts through
| the fud pretty well.
|
| https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-Stallman
I don't know exactly what you are referring to as "FUD" (fear,
uncertainty, and doubt).
The article
I stumbled across this. I think it's concise and well written. Cuts through
the fud pretty well.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-Stallman
https://www.britannica.com/technology/C-computer-programming-language
--
Russell
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe
