Re: [nyphp-talk] Successor to the Web?

2006-10-18 Thread Anirudh Zala
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 18:24, Phil Duffy wrote: > I am sorry if this question appears to be off-topic, but perhaps someone > can refer me to the correct forum. I had programmed in approximately a > dozen languages previously before dabbling in PHP a couple years ago. Now > that PHP 5 is tru

Re: [nyphp-talk] [OT] Re: Successor to the Web?

2006-10-18 Thread Anirudh Zala
On Thursday 19 October 2006 03:03, inforequest wrote: > Phil Duffy phil-at-bearingasset.com |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote: > > I am sorry if this question appears to be off-topic, but perhaps > > someone can refer me to the correct forum. I had programmed in > > approximately a dozen langua

Re: [nyphp-talk] Constructors and

2006-10-18 Thread Dell Sala
I think you've got the right idea. Loading the user data should occur outside the constructor so you can check for success. A little off topic: It looks like your moving towards a DataObject pattern and if you haven't explored this already it's worth a look. DataObjects typically have somet

Re: [nyphp-talk] Successor to the Web?

2006-10-18 Thread Billy Reisinger
Second Life is cool, but comparing it to teh interweb is not very enlightening.   Second life is maintained by a private company, and you need their client on your computer to connect to their world.  They are in control.  With the web, nobody is really in control.  Sure, new standards seem to take

Re: [nyphp-talk] Constructors and

2006-10-18 Thread Matthew Terenzio
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:05 PM, csnyder wrote: > I think it's good practice to keep actions out of the constructor. Fair enough. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't either overthinking or underthinking it. ; ) ___ New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List

Re: [nyphp-talk] Ask NYCPHP: PHP Information Sources

2006-10-18 Thread inforequest
Chris Shiflett shiflett-at-php.net |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote: >Jon Baer wrote: > > >>Yeah I think the "rollups" are pretty good info to have since it >>saves you work on finding everyones blog ... >> >>http://www.planet-php.org/ >>http://www.planetmysql.org/ >> >> > >We need a Pla

Re: [nyphp-talk] Constructors and

2006-10-18 Thread csnyder
On 10/18/06, Matthew Terenzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just seems cumbersome to create a new object and ALWAYS > follow with a given method. > I thought that's what constructors were for. I think it's good practice to keep actions out of the constructor. I typically end up wanting to change co

Re: [nyphp-talk] Ask NYCPHP: PHP Information Sources

2006-10-18 Thread Chris Shiflett
Jon Baer wrote: > Yeah I think the "rollups" are pretty good info to have since it > saves you work on finding everyones blog ... > > http://www.planet-php.org/ > http://www.planetmysql.org/ We need a Planet NYPHP. Chris -- Chris Shiflett http://shiflett.org/ __

Re: [nyphp-talk] Ask NYCPHP: PHP Information Sources

2006-10-18 Thread Jon Baer
Yeah I think the "rollups" are pretty good info to have since it saves you work on finding everyones blog ... http://www.planet-php.org/ http://www.planetmysql.org/ - Jon On Oct 18, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Brian Dailey wrote: > As developers it's our responsibility to keep up with new > technolog