Hello Everyone,
I have a computer that I am selling here that is one hell of a deal.
The system is approx 1 yr old and the display approx 7mos old. I am
selling this for ONLY $900 + shipping costs. It's sad but I never use
the system and I want to upgrade from the PowerMac G5 to the Mac Pro
and
Rob Marscher wrote:
I think the "proper" use of HTML tables is to display a list of things
ordered into rows and columns. As Chris Snyder pointed out in a
previous post in this thread, you can use it for a form of labels and
inputs, or for thumbnails and descriptions, as well as traditional
t
I would actually say some of the finer designers I've worked with prefer
div/css because of the amount of control they're afforded and the speed at
which they can update their designs, especially for multiple formats, which
Rob mentioned. Tables are easier for specific layouts, but I've seen css
I think the "proper" use of HTML tables is to display a list of things
ordered into rows and columns. As Chris Snyder pointed out in a
previous post in this thread, you can use it for a form of labels and
inputs, or for thumbnails and descriptions, as well as traditional
tabular data, and I'm
That's what I'm talggin about!
And with the top post, too. Nice.
On 1/12/07, Jeff Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yo... I got yah presentation righ here!
On 1/12/07, csnyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Jon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah ... @ least we haven't seen o
I feel kinda bad for him, its the greatest thing since sliced bread
and he was going to charge a few bucks for it and everyone whined.
Well worth more than any commercial debug tool on the market ...
http://www.getfirebug.com/contribute.html
- Jon
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:27 PM, csnyder wrot
Yo... I got yah presentation righ here!
On 1/12/07, csnyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/11/07, Jon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah ... @ least we haven't seen one of these @ a NYPHP meetup (...
> yet ...)
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/eugevon/130610241/
>
Paging Jeff Knight, it'
It definitely depends on how you're utilizing Ajax methods.
On the client side, a page load including headers, tags, external files,
image / object loading, any onLoad javascript, etc can be a rather heavy
process for the browser as well as the network (firebug gives a good glimpse
of all of this)
On 1/11/07, Jon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah ... @ least we haven't seen one of these @ a NYPHP meetup (...
yet ...)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eugevon/130610241/
Paging Jeff Knight, it's time for another presentation.
-chris.
___
New
Thanks everyone for your detailed responses. Great discussion!
my understanding is that there was no prior discussion of code
ownership, or even a contract -- only a brief, home-made copyright
statement embedded in the source code after it was completed.
In a case like this it sounds like t
On 1/12/07, Cliff Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fascinating!!! This is about the coolest thing I've tried in a while.
Never noticed the net tab before.
But you noticed the live CSS editing, right? It ends the cycle of
edit-save-refresh, edit-save-refresh. Joe Hewitt deserves the next
Nobel
I feel better now -- my site's not the slowest.
CNN -- 200 requests, 516KB, 13.39 seconds.
Firebug is very sobering.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Cliff Hirsch
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:17 PM
To: 'NYPHP Talk'
Subject: RE: [nyphp
Fascinating!!! This is about the coolest thing I've tried in a while.
Never noticed the net tab before.
I just tried a few sites -- amazing results. My own site that I'm
developing varies from 300ms for a cached page (why are those cached css
and js files still taking so long) to more than 2 secon
On 1/12/07, Kenneth Downs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this correct? And if so, why is it so dramatically expensive to
render a page from scratch, that Ajax could make such a dramatic
improvement to the situation?
I cannot recommend the Firebug extension for FireFox enough. It has a
"Net" ta
On a high traffic site, I supposed the lighter-weight processing and
response of an ajax request could have a significant impact (although
server-side caching would probably change that). But for the average
site/webapp, I would question the assumption that ajax is in fact
faster. Bandwidth
David Mintz wrote:
> This thread probably belongs on front-end but... no doubt but that tables
> are for tabular data. There's a nice SitePoint book about kicking the
> table habit: http://www.sitepoint.com/books/css2/. Forms are the one
> thing with which I haven't been able to get clean and sob
This really depends on the library you are using and getting the
server and XHR cache to work in sync w/ content-negotiated responses.
There is a bunch of stuff if you Google "XHR caching". However I
usually put this step in the "tuning" category when you are testing,
there are a few teste
Kenneth Downs wrote:
> We've all seen the amazing results you can get when you start using
> Ajax, they all come down to one thing: speed.
>
> Question is, how is such a speed-up accomplished? The standard answer
> is that a complete trip to the server is averted, but this is not true,
> in fact
We've all seen the amazing results you can get when you start using
Ajax, they all come down to one thing: speed.
Question is, how is such a speed-up accomplished? The standard answer
is that a complete trip to the server is averted, but this is not true,
in fact a complete cycle does occur:
Rob Marscher wrote:
Usually if you avoid using tables for layout, you can drastically
change the layout of your page without altering the html. If you keep
to the indended use of the html tags, then the page should look
somewhat ok if you turn off your styles altogether (which is maybe how
it
Gracias so much. That combination of escape and single quote did work.
Thank you again. Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kenneth Dombrowski
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 9:19 AM
To: talk@lists.nyphp.org
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] [OT]
i would guess:
scp file.php [EMAIL PROTECTED]:'somedir/filedir/files\&pics/file.php'
single quotes to escape it for the local shell + backslash to escape it
for the remote shell
On 07-01-12 08:10 -0500, Peter Sawczynec wrote:
> When using SCP to transfer a file that uses an ampersand in th
When using SCP to transfer a file that uses an ampersand in the full file
path name like so:
somedir/filedir/files&pics/file.php
...the transfer fails because ampersand is a special command character to
the application.
How does one represent the ampersand in the file path so that SCP will
igno
Michael Sims jellicle-at-gmail.com |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote:
Contractors that insist that they retain ownership of the code that I pay
them to produce... would not be hired by me. Nor would I hire a wedding
photographer who insisted that they owned the negatives to the pictures
th
24 matches
Mail list logo
